Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hex Shenanigans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 7983194" data-attributes="member: 6855114"><p>Far from it. There are consequences to choosing your patron. RP is a big part of our game and backgrounds are played. I like the players to think about the consequences of their actions and their decisions. If they follow an ethos, then the ethos is supposed to be a big thing for the character. A warpriest will not have the same RP as a priest of life. A warlock of the fey will not act in the same way as a warlock of the fiend. It might be obvious when said this way, but at a lot of table it is not. In many tables I have seen, Joe the fighter acts the same way as Joe the paladin or Joe the ranger. This is not my/our kind of game.</p><p></p><p>I have two groups and if I wanted to, I could have more. But family and work takes a lot of time. I am no longer the young adult that had four or five groups full time. My games are very democratic and every single modification to a rule (of which there are very few) are voted upon by all players (both groups vote). What you see externally as adversarial DMing is in fact a common decision by 13 peoples (groups are 6 players strong) that decided to have a common view of the game. We are very RAW oriented and the modifications to the base games are all from the options in the DMG (save 2 minor modifications). </p><p></p><p>I have yet to find a ruling to which all my players did not agree in principle (though sometimes, it is agreed upon reluctantly as a child knows he did something wrong but will not admit it). And if I make a mistake (which I do make, that is why I love this forum. It offers a lot of views and clarifications that I really like) I am quick to accept and amend myself. </p><p></p><p>I am playing/DMing with these principles.</p><p>1) Everyone must shine. </p><p>2) Background and personal history matter. If not why make them?</p><p>3) All rolls are on the open. Mine and the players'.</p><p>4) RP is important. Alignment is important. Ethos is important.</p><p>5) Everyone must have fun. Bad things can happen. But in the end, we want to have fun. (and not just the girls!)</p><p>6) Respect at the table is of utmost importance.</p><p>7) The DM can be wrong. So can the players. That is why #6 is there. So let's talk about it instead.</p><p>8) No drugs and only a moderate amount of beers will be tolerated. A game is not a place to get high or drunk.</p><p>and finally, </p><p>9) All modifications to the game must be approved by the majority of all players. Both groups.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 7983194, member: 6855114"] Far from it. There are consequences to choosing your patron. RP is a big part of our game and backgrounds are played. I like the players to think about the consequences of their actions and their decisions. If they follow an ethos, then the ethos is supposed to be a big thing for the character. A warpriest will not have the same RP as a priest of life. A warlock of the fey will not act in the same way as a warlock of the fiend. It might be obvious when said this way, but at a lot of table it is not. In many tables I have seen, Joe the fighter acts the same way as Joe the paladin or Joe the ranger. This is not my/our kind of game. I have two groups and if I wanted to, I could have more. But family and work takes a lot of time. I am no longer the young adult that had four or five groups full time. My games are very democratic and every single modification to a rule (of which there are very few) are voted upon by all players (both groups vote). What you see externally as adversarial DMing is in fact a common decision by 13 peoples (groups are 6 players strong) that decided to have a common view of the game. We are very RAW oriented and the modifications to the base games are all from the options in the DMG (save 2 minor modifications). I have yet to find a ruling to which all my players did not agree in principle (though sometimes, it is agreed upon reluctantly as a child knows he did something wrong but will not admit it). And if I make a mistake (which I do make, that is why I love this forum. It offers a lot of views and clarifications that I really like) I am quick to accept and amend myself. I am playing/DMing with these principles. 1) Everyone must shine. 2) Background and personal history matter. If not why make them? 3) All rolls are on the open. Mine and the players'. 4) RP is important. Alignment is important. Ethos is important. 5) Everyone must have fun. Bad things can happen. But in the end, we want to have fun. (and not just the girls!) 6) Respect at the table is of utmost importance. 7) The DM can be wrong. So can the players. That is why #6 is there. So let's talk about it instead. 8) No drugs and only a moderate amount of beers will be tolerated. A game is not a place to get high or drunk. and finally, 9) All modifications to the game must be approved by the majority of all players. Both groups. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hex Shenanigans
Top