Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mort" data-source="post: 7986088" data-attributes="member: 762">Yes. Though looking back at the posts and the actual arguments, I don't think this is actually a rules dispute. Both sides are aware what the rules say and what the RAW result would be. The dispute is more a question of is this a good call by the DM.Agreed.This seems more like a thematic/stylistic question than anything else. It should be the rare scenario where the DM narrates a character being captured then executed with no input from thr player or the other players. I can't really envision such a scenario being fun - and if it's not fun - why is it happening?Again, I don't actually think there is disagreement here.As above, this seems less a rules dispute and more a player and DM having different expectations of the campaign/scenario. Now I'm never a fan of the player getting into some kind of pissing contest with the DM - that's just stupid and bound to end badly. But it's the DMs job to address the situation with the player. Maybe the player has always been in campaigns where doing stuff like this "for the lulz" is just how things were done?Again, not really a rules dispute; much more a player/DM communication issue.</blockquote>