Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hexes and offset squares
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4109130" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>If one uses a system of:</p><p></p><p>0 to 1/3 hex: cannot be used.</p><p>1/3 to 2/3 hex: squeeze</p><p>2/3 to full hex: normal</p><p></p><p>Then a PC could use a half hex to fight from, but he would be squeezing.</p><p></p><p>Pros and Cons:</p><p></p><p>1) If the line is drawn along the spline (e.g. a wall with hex / half hex / hex / half hex), then a combatant could only be attacked by 3 opponents. But, he would be squeezing, so those opponents would gain advantage. However, the "make all lines force more than 1/2 hex" drawing suggestion (as above, a very good suggestion), this would not be possible. One would never draw along the spline. In the case of never drawing along the spline, the worse case scenario would be one of having a PC's back to the wall, but 4 opponents could attack him (best case, near the spline drawing, 3 opponents).</p><p></p><p>2) Two PCs could fight back to back in a hex, but they would be at the squeeze penalty. Again, one would only want to use that when vastly outnumbered (e.g. two in one hex could only be attacked by 6 opponents, two it two back to back hexes could be attacked by 8 opponents). This is not much of a gain (and might even be considered a loss) unless space is at a premium or something.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't allow two PCs to fight back to back if they could fight in the same hex with no penalties (i.e. in a 50% or more of a hex had no penalties system). It's just waiting to be abused.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think one of the better systems is to use something like:</p><p></p><p>0 to 1/3 hex: cannot be used.</p><p>1/3 to 2/3 hex: squeeze</p><p>2/3 to full hex: normal</p><p></p><p>and then draw a room whatever shape and size one wants. Additionally, try to use the "try to avoid half hexes" suggestion above when possible and do not allow 2 PCs in the same hex. Finally, allow two half hexes to be joined to create a full hex in the perpendicular off of a spline narrow corridor case (and anytime a weird narrow tunnel or corridor exists that does not have near full hexes in it, allow two smaller hex portions to be used as a hex).</p><p></p><p>If a DM does this, everything just falls into place and it is simple to adjudicate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4109130, member: 2011"] If one uses a system of: 0 to 1/3 hex: cannot be used. 1/3 to 2/3 hex: squeeze 2/3 to full hex: normal Then a PC could use a half hex to fight from, but he would be squeezing. Pros and Cons: 1) If the line is drawn along the spline (e.g. a wall with hex / half hex / hex / half hex), then a combatant could only be attacked by 3 opponents. But, he would be squeezing, so those opponents would gain advantage. However, the "make all lines force more than 1/2 hex" drawing suggestion (as above, a very good suggestion), this would not be possible. One would never draw along the spline. In the case of never drawing along the spline, the worse case scenario would be one of having a PC's back to the wall, but 4 opponents could attack him (best case, near the spline drawing, 3 opponents). 2) Two PCs could fight back to back in a hex, but they would be at the squeeze penalty. Again, one would only want to use that when vastly outnumbered (e.g. two in one hex could only be attacked by 6 opponents, two it two back to back hexes could be attacked by 8 opponents). This is not much of a gain (and might even be considered a loss) unless space is at a premium or something. I wouldn't allow two PCs to fight back to back if they could fight in the same hex with no penalties (i.e. in a 50% or more of a hex had no penalties system). It's just waiting to be abused. I think one of the better systems is to use something like: 0 to 1/3 hex: cannot be used. 1/3 to 2/3 hex: squeeze 2/3 to full hex: normal and then draw a room whatever shape and size one wants. Additionally, try to use the "try to avoid half hexes" suggestion above when possible and do not allow 2 PCs in the same hex. Finally, allow two half hexes to be joined to create a full hex in the perpendicular off of a spline narrow corridor case (and anytime a weird narrow tunnel or corridor exists that does not have near full hexes in it, allow two smaller hex portions to be used as a hex). If a DM does this, everything just falls into place and it is simple to adjudicate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hexes and offset squares
Top