Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3329296" data-attributes="member: 35788">That made me laugh out loud.&nbsp; And ... just if you are keeping track, my official answer would be something like: &quot;Queasy, but still able to hold it down with effort.&quot; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />As I said before, I don't necessarily mind them being around.&nbsp; I ignore them.&nbsp; But it is a bit frustrating to have so many 4i threads because their topic is so narrowly focused.&nbsp; Having said that, I completely understand that the mods are right when they said that there is a category for a reason.&nbsp; So they expects 'em, and I can ignore 'em.&nbsp; It all works.In the end, though, I'd have to say that my reaction isn't so much about the subject as the volume.&nbsp; I remember a few months back when the 1st page of the Rules forum had three different threads asking where to find the Duskblade spell list.&nbsp; That was annoying, too!&nbsp; Or, the variety of &quot;What do ____ eat&quot; threads was annoying.&nbsp; (Once Piratecat brought my attention to how many there actually were in his only slightly exaggerated post in the meta-forum!)My point is that my reaction to 4i threads is not regarding the subject matter, just the volume.&nbsp; But hey, they'll drop off the front page soon enough.&nbsp; No biggie.[I'm using the suggestion that we call it 4i ... since it is still imaginary! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3329296, member: 35788"] That made me laugh out loud. And ... just if you are keeping track, my official answer would be something like: "Queasy, but still able to hold it down with effort." :D As I said before, I don't necessarily mind them being around. I ignore them. But it is a bit frustrating to have so many 4i threads because their topic is so narrowly focused. Having said that, I completely understand that the mods are right when they said that there is a category for a reason. So they expects 'em, and I can ignore 'em. It all works. In the end, though, I'd have to say that my reaction isn't so much about the subject as the volume. I remember a few months back when the 1st page of the Rules forum had three different threads asking where to find the Duskblade spell list. That was annoying, too! Or, the variety of "What do ____ eat" threads was annoying. (Once Piratecat brought my attention to how many there actually were in his only slightly exaggerated post in the meta-forum!) My point is that my reaction to 4i threads is not regarding the subject matter, just the volume. But hey, they'll drop off the front page soon enough. No biggie. [I'm using the suggestion that we call it 4i ... since it is still imaginary! :D] [/QUOTE]

Verification