Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Hidden Kingdom – Where is it Going? The Arthurian Role-Playing Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gene Riemenschneider" data-source="post: 6778664" data-attributes="member: 6806990"><p><strong>Hidden Kingdom – Where is it Going? The Arthurian Role-Playing Game</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000080">Hidden Kingdom – Where is it Going? The Arthurian Role-Playing Game</span></p><p><span style="color: #000080"></span>Please Find us and support us on Kickstarter</p><p><span style="color: #000080">I was asked where Hidden Kingdom is going and what people could expect with supplements. This is a great question, but there is something you need to understand about Hidden Kingdom. When we designed the game the idea was to keep it simple – at least in terms of how to play the game and game mechanics. There is a rich background and background story, but it is simple to play and you can start playing it very fast. The other thing is it is designed so you can play it one time at a single setting and have a full game experience or have a long campaign.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000080">That being said any additions to the game will only be made to enhance smoothness of play or will be a natural extension of the existing system that will not add layers of complication – in terms of mechanics. I love complications in terms of strategy.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000080">Three areas o fGame Mechanics that I can see supplements and changes too are as follows:</span></p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"> <span style="color: #000080">The basic combat system. It will remain the same but I want to add an element for Critical Hits. As the combat system stands it is hard if not impossible to kill someone with one hit, we did not want a bloody game and we wanted combat to be a drawn out affair like in the stories. However, the stories also include people being killed with one stoke of the sword and that has to be present. (although rare.) The game assumes most combat to be between Knights with similar equipment. Armor, Shield, Broad Sword (or lance), and all combat stats are based on that; but you can use different weapons with some adjustments. I want to reduce the To Hit penalties for stronger knights when they go to a bigger weapon (Battle Ax or Two Handed Sword) and work in some more advantages for the use of a mace. Possible add some other weapons. The trade offs for different weapons has to be done in such away that it will take more than simple math to make a choice. There are some other ideas along these lines.</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #000080">The alignment system needs to be fleshed out. Right now you earn points for accomplish task associated with your alignment. There needs to be a real fleshing out of the points and how you get them. Also in designed encounters and quest points for certain task need to be included in the module. But this is just the first part of the change. Accomplishing things within ones alignment(s) will have tangible consequences. These will often be things like attracting followers and retainers, economic benefits for your province or kingdom, and then negative consequences too. A Powerlord may become the object of a Quest Knight (to bring him to justice). A Christian Knight that establishes churches and monasteries may attract Viking Raids. One theme in the tails of King Arthur is that the Land and the King are one. As the King goes so goes the Land. Noble and just Kings bring peace and prosperity. I really want to see this fleshed out.</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #000080">The economics of the game has been kept very simple. Wealth is measured in Food Production, Spear Production, and Horses. I would like to expand this somewhat to Crops, Fishing, Live Stock, Wood, and Metals. Different provinces would have different strengths and weakness depending on locations. Mountainous areas will have good metal production, coastal communities might have some boats and good fishing. This will lead to trade and trade offs. Perhaps new types of military units based on local economics. It will also allow an expansion or fleshing out of the provincial disaster rolls (and new ways for Alignment to come into play). But of course the game also needs a simple and stream lined alternative for those more interested in just questing and such.</span></li> </ol><p><span style="color: #000080">Those are all areas of Game Mechanics, but Hidden Kingdom is designed to have a certain feel about it. The game is supposed to take you into the semi mythical dark ages and times of King Arthur. I think there are some modules that can help with this:</span></p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"> <span style="color: #000080">The situation-type encounters in the game where designed to reflect how in the stories knights would frequently ride upon a situation and become involved in a larger matter. There are 96 of these in the game and they are really a key part of the design. More of these should be written and added to the game. (There is some room to work on the Monsters and Beast Section). They will be made available as a supplement.</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #000080">Stand alone modules of larger Quest. Although there are the Quest in the Legends (The Grail Quest for example) I think we could make some quest that reflect the mood of the stories and existing Legends where the player does not know how it is to end.</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #000080">A map of France. Parts of France where very big in the Arthurian Legends. It was where Lancelot and his kin where from (although in this game we have given them a place in Britain). This would expand play area and possibilities. </span></li> </ol><p><span style="color: #000080">There are other areas that we can and will work on and will, but these are the ones I have some strong ideas about and a direction I would like to go. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gene Riemenschneider, post: 6778664, member: 6806990"] [b]Hidden Kingdom – Where is it Going? The Arthurian Role-Playing Game[/b] [COLOR=#000080]Hidden Kingdom – Where is it Going? The Arthurian Role-Playing Game [/COLOR]Please Find us and support us on Kickstarter [COLOR=#000080]I was asked where Hidden Kingdom is going and what people could expect with supplements. This is a great question, but there is something you need to understand about Hidden Kingdom. When we designed the game the idea was to keep it simple – at least in terms of how to play the game and game mechanics. There is a rich background and background story, but it is simple to play and you can start playing it very fast. The other thing is it is designed so you can play it one time at a single setting and have a full game experience or have a long campaign.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]That being said any additions to the game will only be made to enhance smoothness of play or will be a natural extension of the existing system that will not add layers of complication – in terms of mechanics. I love complications in terms of strategy.[/COLOR] [COLOR=#000080]Three areas o fGame Mechanics that I can see supplements and changes too are as follows:[/COLOR] [LIST=1] [*] [COLOR=#000080]The basic combat system. It will remain the same but I want to add an element for Critical Hits. As the combat system stands it is hard if not impossible to kill someone with one hit, we did not want a bloody game and we wanted combat to be a drawn out affair like in the stories. However, the stories also include people being killed with one stoke of the sword and that has to be present. (although rare.) The game assumes most combat to be between Knights with similar equipment. Armor, Shield, Broad Sword (or lance), and all combat stats are based on that; but you can use different weapons with some adjustments. I want to reduce the To Hit penalties for stronger knights when they go to a bigger weapon (Battle Ax or Two Handed Sword) and work in some more advantages for the use of a mace. Possible add some other weapons. The trade offs for different weapons has to be done in such away that it will take more than simple math to make a choice. There are some other ideas along these lines.[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#000080]The alignment system needs to be fleshed out. Right now you earn points for accomplish task associated with your alignment. There needs to be a real fleshing out of the points and how you get them. Also in designed encounters and quest points for certain task need to be included in the module. But this is just the first part of the change. Accomplishing things within ones alignment(s) will have tangible consequences. These will often be things like attracting followers and retainers, economic benefits for your province or kingdom, and then negative consequences too. A Powerlord may become the object of a Quest Knight (to bring him to justice). A Christian Knight that establishes churches and monasteries may attract Viking Raids. One theme in the tails of King Arthur is that the Land and the King are one. As the King goes so goes the Land. Noble and just Kings bring peace and prosperity. I really want to see this fleshed out.[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#000080]The economics of the game has been kept very simple. Wealth is measured in Food Production, Spear Production, and Horses. I would like to expand this somewhat to Crops, Fishing, Live Stock, Wood, and Metals. Different provinces would have different strengths and weakness depending on locations. Mountainous areas will have good metal production, coastal communities might have some boats and good fishing. This will lead to trade and trade offs. Perhaps new types of military units based on local economics. It will also allow an expansion or fleshing out of the provincial disaster rolls (and new ways for Alignment to come into play). But of course the game also needs a simple and stream lined alternative for those more interested in just questing and such.[/COLOR] [/LIST] [COLOR=#000080]Those are all areas of Game Mechanics, but Hidden Kingdom is designed to have a certain feel about it. The game is supposed to take you into the semi mythical dark ages and times of King Arthur. I think there are some modules that can help with this:[/COLOR] [LIST=1] [*] [COLOR=#000080]The situation-type encounters in the game where designed to reflect how in the stories knights would frequently ride upon a situation and become involved in a larger matter. There are 96 of these in the game and they are really a key part of the design. More of these should be written and added to the game. (There is some room to work on the Monsters and Beast Section). They will be made available as a supplement.[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#000080]Stand alone modules of larger Quest. Although there are the Quest in the Legends (The Grail Quest for example) I think we could make some quest that reflect the mood of the stories and existing Legends where the player does not know how it is to end.[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#000080]A map of France. Parts of France where very big in the Arthurian Legends. It was where Lancelot and his kin where from (although in this game we have given them a place in Britain). This would expand play area and possibilities. [/COLOR] [/LIST] [COLOR=#000080]There are other areas that we can and will work on and will, but these are the ones I have some strong ideas about and a direction I would like to go. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Hidden Kingdom – Where is it Going? The Arthurian Role-Playing Game
Top