Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="GullyFoyle" data-source="post: 988286" data-attributes="member: 12970">Re: They allow that alreadyIn response to raven_dark64I agree with Destil. I think your defining &quot;being wary&quot; too broadly. A guard is suppose to be wary but his level of concentration will&nbsp; vary during the six hours of guard duty,&nbsp; the same can be said for the person that knows there is a contract out on them. Both can still be sneaked attack. But, if an arrow flies by their head, or they hear an odd sound, or see a strange movement, then they are now sufficiently consentrating to be wary and avoid the sneak attack. Why use this more narrow definition of warrieness? Because it doesn't counterdict the idea that you can sneak attack in combat. It is planely stated that you can sneak attack an opponent when you have a comrad on their opposite side. In this case your enemy knows your there,&nbsp; but cannot not concentrate aon being &quot;wary&quot; of you because they have to avoid your partners attacks. It works well with the narrower definition.Anyway this is my reasoning,Gully Foyle</blockquote>

[QUOTE="GullyFoyle, post: 988286, member: 12970"] [b]Re: They allow that already[/b] In response to raven_dark64 I agree with Destil. I think your defining "being wary" too broadly. A guard is suppose to be wary but his level of concentration will vary during the six hours of guard duty, the same can be said for the person that knows there is a contract out on them. Both can still be sneaked attack. But, if an arrow flies by their head, or they hear an odd sound, or see a strange movement, then they are now sufficiently consentrating to be wary and avoid the sneak attack. Why use this more narrow definition of warrieness? Because it doesn't counterdict the idea that you can sneak attack in combat. It is planely stated that you can sneak attack an opponent when you have a comrad on their opposite side. In this case your enemy knows your there, but cannot not concentrate aon being "wary" of you because they have to avoid your partners attacks. It works well with the narrower definition. Anyway this is my reasoning, Gully Foyle [/QUOTE]

Verification