Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
hiding = invisible?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Methos of Aundair" data-source="post: 1725535" data-attributes="member: 21764"><p>Um, I don’t believe you are reading all of the posts. The new topic is not the surprise round, but once combat has already been started how would it affect the rogue who is successfully hidden from the opponents. Once combat has started you cannot have a surprise round in the middle of combat. Please reread the thread, you’ll find, as usual, the thread has changed the topic of discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The way that sounds, especially the “to hide while attacking”, makes me believe it is referring to a rogue attempting to attack while hiding. Such as the cases we have brought up in the previous posts. In Souljourner’s example, the rogue who was hiding behind crates (cover) attacked two thugs who were in combat together. Now, say the rogue is attempting to attack but wishes to stay hidden, this in my opinion would require a new Hide check at the -20 penalty. If successful, in other words the thugs failed their spot check, then the attack would be considered a SA. I don’t believe the rules state that just because the rogue is hidden successfully the attack is automatically considered a SA. If it were, than why do they add these additional statements regarding penalty (the -20 while attacking, charging, running, and the specific section under sniping).</p><p></p><p>In a surprise round it is entirely different. If the rogue has a higher initiative than his opponent, it is a SA. But, in the above we are not talking about surprise rounds, we are talking about during combat after it has started.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>True. But, even if she was leaving her hiding place after the attack, she is still effectively attacking while hiding, behind the crates, in the shadows, whatever. It doesn’t matter in this instance that she doesn’t plan on re-hiding, in order to get the SA during an ongoing combat she must IMO attack while hiding. That round you are effectively attacking during a hide attempt. It doesn't matter what you are doing the next round, it's this particular round. </p><p></p><p>The re-hiding statement you mention, notice it is under the sniping section of hide and it states “You take a –20 penalty on your Hide check to conceal yourself after the shot”. Notice the “after the shot” statement. This appears to only be for ranged attacks. Appears mind you.</p><p></p><p>@glassjaw</p><p></p><p>Haha. Isn’t it hilarious how quick a question or discussion can change direction. Oh well, that’s the fun of these boards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Methos of Aundair, post: 1725535, member: 21764"] Um, I don’t believe you are reading all of the posts. The new topic is not the surprise round, but once combat has already been started how would it affect the rogue who is successfully hidden from the opponents. Once combat has started you cannot have a surprise round in the middle of combat. Please reread the thread, you’ll find, as usual, the thread has changed the topic of discussion. The way that sounds, especially the “to hide while attacking”, makes me believe it is referring to a rogue attempting to attack while hiding. Such as the cases we have brought up in the previous posts. In Souljourner’s example, the rogue who was hiding behind crates (cover) attacked two thugs who were in combat together. Now, say the rogue is attempting to attack but wishes to stay hidden, this in my opinion would require a new Hide check at the -20 penalty. If successful, in other words the thugs failed their spot check, then the attack would be considered a SA. I don’t believe the rules state that just because the rogue is hidden successfully the attack is automatically considered a SA. If it were, than why do they add these additional statements regarding penalty (the -20 while attacking, charging, running, and the specific section under sniping). In a surprise round it is entirely different. If the rogue has a higher initiative than his opponent, it is a SA. But, in the above we are not talking about surprise rounds, we are talking about during combat after it has started. True. But, even if she was leaving her hiding place after the attack, she is still effectively attacking while hiding, behind the crates, in the shadows, whatever. It doesn’t matter in this instance that she doesn’t plan on re-hiding, in order to get the SA during an ongoing combat she must IMO attack while hiding. That round you are effectively attacking during a hide attempt. It doesn't matter what you are doing the next round, it's this particular round. The re-hiding statement you mention, notice it is under the sniping section of hide and it states “You take a –20 penalty on your Hide check to conceal yourself after the shot”. Notice the “after the shot” statement. This appears to only be for ranged attacks. Appears mind you. @glassjaw Haha. Isn’t it hilarious how quick a question or discussion can change direction. Oh well, that’s the fun of these boards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
hiding = invisible?
Top