Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7551084" data-attributes="member: 12731">Not sure your point. You say the default system is broken. Okay? How does this comment upon my preference for using the silver piece in place of gold?(That D&D is entirely removed from realism - absolutely. And I also tried to deflect away from any discussion along the "silver is more realistic than gold" line. Since D&D is not realistic anyhow, I prefer to simply say "...because I like a silver-based economy better" <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )As for the mountains of gold, I was merely making the observation that switching to silver does bring about one (minor) hiccup: being able to present a physically impressive hoard for the heroes to loot. Not a big issue - in fact an easily managed issue. But still.ZappPS. Every comment I am making in this thread assumes my magic item economy - this thread is literally about what magic items costs in my campaign. So, sorry, but the notion "money should be the least of their problems in a vanilla setting" is entirely off topic here and I won't address it.Regards,Zapp</blockquote>