Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 4917516" data-attributes="member: 35909">Yeah, I vaguely brought up most of those points, but since you were so kind to explicitly state exactly the situation...wow, I had forgotten how bad kobolds are gimped.I'm normally hesitant to let people min-max the aging rules, but in the Kobold's case...I don't see how it could make him terribly broken.&nbsp; If anything will make him broken, it'll be being a caster. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />You could always compromise and let him be middle-aged or old instead of venerable, so he gets some benefits but not the most possible.&nbsp; What is the lifespan of a kobold anyway?&nbsp; Especially if it's not that lengthy, being old aged could even make sense.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 4917516, member: 35909"] Yeah, I vaguely brought up most of those points, but since you were so kind to explicitly state exactly the situation...wow, I had forgotten how bad kobolds are gimped. I'm normally hesitant to let people min-max the aging rules, but in the Kobold's case...I don't see how it could make him terribly broken. If anything will make him broken, it'll be being a caster. :) You could always compromise and let him be middle-aged or old instead of venerable, so he gets some benefits but not the most possible. What is the lifespan of a kobold anyway? Especially if it's not that lengthy, being old aged could even make sense. [/QUOTE]

Verification