Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Creamsteak" data-source="post: 3788925" data-attributes="member: 552">1) Yes. 2) Yes.Regarding these two, I want to maintain the transparency between the two where it regards combat mechanics because I feel it's important that there not be a massive difference between the two where it concerns how strong or weak a character is. The transperancy will not exist though for things I consider primarily non-combat (detecting magic/psionics, identify, skills).However, I will occationally (at my discretion) have creatures that have pure "spell resistance" or "psionics resistance." This won't generally apply to anything a player does though. It's more there as a storytelling mechanic. A Psion-Killer golem is going to be vulnerable to arcane and divine magic. A similar anti-sorcerer creature is going to be vulnerable to psionics. As far as this intent goes, it could also even apply to divine magic (for example, there may even be creatures that are hunting God Kings, and as such are resistant to their divine power). This is more of a flavor mechanic.To summarize, if it benefits the players there's a good chance that it works for all 3 (such as dispel mechanics). If it is something very specific to lore, it probably has less transparency.3) I havn't checked yet, but if the price matches the cost it would be based on the dmg pricing guide I see nothing wrong with that.4) Spiked chain is fine.5) I'd be fine with that particular one.</blockquote>