noretoc
First Post
Re: Re: Re: Highlander Endgame
To me it looked like the TV series took place before the final gathering. I always though that one day Duncan was gonna get it, and Conner would then go on and take the prize. I thought the movies beside the first were rubbish. Especially two. Three was ok, but I hated the non-continuity. Four was complete rubbish. I liked the series, and the sword fights. The story, etc. But as I said during the whole time I watched it, I always had in my head it would not be Duncan who won, but Conner.
Orius said:
Quick question: how do you "There can be only one!" purists deal with the existance of the TV show? It would be a shame if you ignore it completely, because Duncan rocks.
To me it looked like the TV series took place before the final gathering. I always though that one day Duncan was gonna get it, and Conner would then go on and take the prize. I thought the movies beside the first were rubbish. Especially two. Three was ok, but I hated the non-continuity. Four was complete rubbish. I liked the series, and the sword fights. The story, etc. But as I said during the whole time I watched it, I always had in my head it would not be Duncan who won, but Conner.