Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dannager" data-source="post: 5716292" data-attributes="member: 73683">Because instead of talking about what was in the interview, you talked about something that wasn't in the interview, and talked about it in such a way as to direct the conversation towards what you were talking about (Neverwinter) rather than the interview itself.Yes it was.Par for the course.You used obviously inflammatory language to refer to Neverwinter (&quot;something like Diablo&quot;, and the implication that it is no longer an RPG). Words are inflammatory when they are used to inflame opinion. There is little point in the way you worded what you said beyond inflaming opinion. Calling it &quot;like Diablo&quot; when we have basically zero evidence that the upcoming game will be like Diablo (and, of course, with the knowledge that the game in its previous planned incarnation was likely much more Diablo-like than what the game will turn out to be) cannot serve any other purpose than to inflame opinion.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dannager, post: 5716292, member: 73683"] Because instead of talking about what was in the interview, you talked about something that wasn't in the interview, and talked about it in such a way as to direct the conversation towards what you were talking about (Neverwinter) rather than the interview itself. Yes it was. Par for the course. You used obviously inflammatory language to refer to Neverwinter ("something like Diablo", and the implication that it is no longer an RPG). Words are inflammatory when they are used to inflame opinion. There is little point in the way you worded what you said [I]beyond[/I] inflaming opinion. Calling it "like Diablo" when we have basically zero evidence that the upcoming game will be like Diablo (and, of course, with the knowledge that the game in its previous planned incarnation was likely much more Diablo-like than what the game will turn out to be) cannot serve any other purpose than to inflame opinion. [/QUOTE]

Verification