Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HalWhitewyrm" data-source="post: 4417468" data-attributes="member: 4046">I'd be right there with you except the non-open nature of 4e content makes me feel that innovation won't happen as quickly as it did before (not to mention that, while some eventual new design may help my game, it doesn't necessarilly mean that I'll be able to use it for my secondary goal of publication, given the closed nature of material published under the GSL). But that's another can of worms and I don't want to derail this thread from its intended topic (a reminder as much for myself as for others)./looks at the various historical 3.X d20 historical books in the bookshelf to the right, and thinks of various others in PDF.&nbsp;That's a bold statement, but that's the kind of opinion/help I'm looking for.I still haven't gotten to Rituals yet, so I'll be checking that out as a possibility. Since posting earlier, I have kept thinking about it as I read and my second impression is that I'd quite probably have to cap a historical setting at a lower level than the default of 30 in order to simply avoid the high fantasy nerfing that goes on in the Epic tier.There has been some mention of a non-fantasy 4e-esque ruleset coming out next year or so, but nothing more concrete. But that's another thread altogether, so if anything, fork it over.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HalWhitewyrm, post: 4417468, member: 4046"] I'd be right there with you except the non-open nature of 4e content makes me feel that innovation won't happen as quickly as it did before (not to mention that, while some eventual new design may help my game, it doesn't necessarilly mean that I'll be able to use it for my secondary goal of publication, given the closed nature of material published under the GSL). But that's another can of worms and I don't want to derail this thread from its intended topic (a reminder as much for myself as for others). [I]/looks at the various historical 3.X d20 historical books in the bookshelf to the right, and thinks of various others in PDF.[/I] That's a bold statement, but that's the kind of opinion/help I'm looking for. I still haven't gotten to Rituals yet, so I'll be checking that out as a possibility. Since posting earlier, I have kept thinking about it as I read and my second impression is that I'd quite probably have to cap a historical setting at a lower level than the default of 30 in order to simply avoid the high fantasy nerfing that goes on in the Epic tier. There has been some mention of a non-fantasy 4e-esque ruleset coming out next year or so, but nothing more concrete. But that's another thread altogether, so if anything, fork it over. [/QUOTE]

Verification