Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Historically, What Was The Rate of Fire For Crossbows?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 861663" data-attributes="member: 8158"><p>Ah, the great longbow/crossbow debate reareth its head again.</p><p></p><p>Truly, there were all kinds of longbows, many types of crossbows, and armor plates of varying thickness and temper. Talking about the Middle Ages is not like talking about the wild west. What we consider the Middle Ages was, after all, a really long frickin' period of time--we're talking a few centuries here--and it encompassed the better part of a whole darn continent. When you hear some fellow arguing insistently that there is one "official" statistic with regards to how fast a crossbow could be loaded or at what range a bolt could penetrate plate armor, it's safe to assume the person you're listening to hasn't lent a great deal of thought to the matter regardless of how many books he's read or websites he's visited.</p><p></p><p>For instance, a crossbow with a low amount of pull is obviously going to require less effort to recock than one with a heavier draw, and there's quite a bit of difference between the lightest crossbow that ever was and the heaviest one. This is a weapon that went through a long evolution, so why would anyone be surprised to find that documents from the time of the War of the Roses provides different information than was scribed during the Hundred Years War? The latter started a century earlier. </p><p></p><p>For game purposes you have to figure out where you are within the crossbow's evolution. Is it like D&D, where you still have "plain" wood bows existing alongside the patently-superior composites? Are there tempered-steel prods that likewise outshine composites? If you want a crossbow to be more powerful than a bow, then you ought to go with steel. After all, a longbow’s prod has a much broader width than that of a crossbow, so the only thing that could ever endow a crossbow with a better draw is having a prod that’s impossible to pull back by hand. Which begs the question of what reloading devices are available? Can’t decide how fast a crossbow reloads if you don’t have that established. If there are just wooden crossbows, then perhaps marksmen are still reloading by hand or belt claw. If you're up to steel bows, then you're going to need a goot's hoof or, more likely, a crannequin [sic?].</p><p></p><p>This was all likely discussed when 3e went into design, and they ultimately went for the abstracted, highly-unrealistic set of statistics. They threw out STR minimums too, which really would have played a more meaningful part with bows than with melee weapons. Meanwhile, they retained the notions of “mighty” crossbows, which is kind of nonsensical. When you have a +4 mighty light crossbow and a +1 mighty heavy crossbow, why exactly is the former still considered “light” and thus faster to reload than the latter? Light crossbows should not be allowed to be mighty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felon, post: 861663, member: 8158"] Ah, the great longbow/crossbow debate reareth its head again. Truly, there were all kinds of longbows, many types of crossbows, and armor plates of varying thickness and temper. Talking about the Middle Ages is not like talking about the wild west. What we consider the Middle Ages was, after all, a really long frickin' period of time--we're talking a few centuries here--and it encompassed the better part of a whole darn continent. When you hear some fellow arguing insistently that there is one "official" statistic with regards to how fast a crossbow could be loaded or at what range a bolt could penetrate plate armor, it's safe to assume the person you're listening to hasn't lent a great deal of thought to the matter regardless of how many books he's read or websites he's visited. For instance, a crossbow with a low amount of pull is obviously going to require less effort to recock than one with a heavier draw, and there's quite a bit of difference between the lightest crossbow that ever was and the heaviest one. This is a weapon that went through a long evolution, so why would anyone be surprised to find that documents from the time of the War of the Roses provides different information than was scribed during the Hundred Years War? The latter started a century earlier. For game purposes you have to figure out where you are within the crossbow's evolution. Is it like D&D, where you still have "plain" wood bows existing alongside the patently-superior composites? Are there tempered-steel prods that likewise outshine composites? If you want a crossbow to be more powerful than a bow, then you ought to go with steel. After all, a longbow’s prod has a much broader width than that of a crossbow, so the only thing that could ever endow a crossbow with a better draw is having a prod that’s impossible to pull back by hand. Which begs the question of what reloading devices are available? Can’t decide how fast a crossbow reloads if you don’t have that established. If there are just wooden crossbows, then perhaps marksmen are still reloading by hand or belt claw. If you're up to steel bows, then you're going to need a goot's hoof or, more likely, a crannequin [sic?]. This was all likely discussed when 3e went into design, and they ultimately went for the abstracted, highly-unrealistic set of statistics. They threw out STR minimums too, which really would have played a more meaningful part with bows than with melee weapons. Meanwhile, they retained the notions of “mighty” crossbows, which is kind of nonsensical. When you have a +4 mighty light crossbow and a +1 mighty heavy crossbow, why exactly is the former still considered “light” and thus faster to reload than the latter? Light crossbows should not be allowed to be mighty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Historically, What Was The Rate of Fire For Crossbows?
Top