Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Some Dude" data-source="post: 9724815" data-attributes="member: 6980080">Never implied that you were. And I have been looking for sources. But since you seemed to have some already, I saw no harm in asking.To be fair, you are the one making a claim by implication (i.e., that TSR staffers and magazines were not trustworthy when it came to reviews or awards), not I. I'm of the opinion that the person making claims should be the one to supply evidence, but you're certainly free to disagree. And I do appreciate the nuance that I asked a follow-up question, which makes things less clear-cut (if they can be said to be so in the first place).Great advice, thank you. Again, it does seem that you have answers to these questions already, which makes it odd that you implied that some research would be needed to answer them. You are obviously quite knowledgeable, which, again, is why I asked the questions I did.I have lectured no one, and comparing the tone of our respective posts in this thread, I'd say that while there is a lecture happening, it ain't coming from me. I made a simple statement that WG7 was not as hated as it would later become. The idea that I'm making some judgement about your knowledge now or at that time (or saying anything other than what was in my statement) is both extrapolated and inaccurate. No offense.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Some Dude, post: 9724815, member: 6980080"] Never implied that you were. And I have been looking for sources. But since you seemed to have some already, I saw no harm in asking. To be fair, you are the one making a claim by implication (i.e., that TSR staffers and magazines were not trustworthy when it came to reviews or awards), not I. I'm of the opinion that the person making claims should be the one to supply evidence, but you're certainly free to disagree. And I do appreciate the nuance that I asked a follow-up question, which makes things less clear-cut (if they can be said to be so in the first place). Great advice, thank you. Again, it does seem that you have answers to these questions already, which makes it odd that you implied that some research would be needed to answer them. You are obviously quite knowledgeable, which, again, is why I asked the questions I did. I have lectured no one, and comparing the tone of our respective posts in this thread, I'd say that while there is a lecture happening, it ain't coming from me. I made a simple statement that WG7 was not as hated as it would later become. The idea that I'm making some judgement about your knowledge now or at that time (or saying anything other than what was in my statement) is both extrapolated and inaccurate. No offense. [/QUOTE]

Verification