Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Hit Points - A Discussion of a "Solution"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Herremann the Wise" data-source="post: 4548747" data-attributes="member: 11300"><p>I still think the two in conjunction works nicely though (damage involving both strength and skill). However, the high level combat situation you present is an interesting one. I think the combat point/hit point system has a natural buffer for this. It is all about getting at the other character's hit points. However rather than chipping away, I think there would be a natural encouragement to spend some big combat points on abilities designed to get at those hit points.</p><p></p><p>As you mentioned in your first post, there is a nice balance going on between conservative defensiveness and pulling out the big moves to finish the opponent early. I think the slow war of attrition of getting through a wad of points would not happen when there were significant opportunities to do other productive but expensive things.</p><p> </p><p>I suppose this is the thing, at high levels, the fighter can hit most of the time and can deal enough damage to cause issues for the opponent. However, I think it is the other things that the high level fighter does that makes them so good. They would have effective and relatively cheap ways of avoiding criticals - incredibly important against dangerous or large opponents. They can keep their defenses up against multiple opponents, cannot be flanked and can tactically move (not opening themselves up to opportunity attacks) further than 5 feet. Also they get more than one attack a round (I like the idea of not having as many iterative attacks as in 3E). But perhaps most of all, they have large numbers of combat points.</p><p> </p><p>I agree with you here. Minions are an interesting idea but in the end, they just feel a little flimsy to me with that 1 hit point. They encourage unrealistic metagaming which takes me out of the gameworld too easily. However, there should always be a place for such creatures/mooks/minions. For me such creatures should just have hit points (no combat points). They still have skills they can freely use, they are in their way as tough as a non-minion (with no combat points, but the same number of hit points), but when you strike them, it hurts them from the get go. </p><p></p><p>Best Regards</p><p>Herremann the Wise</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Herremann the Wise, post: 4548747, member: 11300"] I still think the two in conjunction works nicely though (damage involving both strength and skill). However, the high level combat situation you present is an interesting one. I think the combat point/hit point system has a natural buffer for this. It is all about getting at the other character's hit points. However rather than chipping away, I think there would be a natural encouragement to spend some big combat points on abilities designed to get at those hit points. As you mentioned in your first post, there is a nice balance going on between conservative defensiveness and pulling out the big moves to finish the opponent early. I think the slow war of attrition of getting through a wad of points would not happen when there were significant opportunities to do other productive but expensive things. I suppose this is the thing, at high levels, the fighter can hit most of the time and can deal enough damage to cause issues for the opponent. However, I think it is the other things that the high level fighter does that makes them so good. They would have effective and relatively cheap ways of avoiding criticals - incredibly important against dangerous or large opponents. They can keep their defenses up against multiple opponents, cannot be flanked and can tactically move (not opening themselves up to opportunity attacks) further than 5 feet. Also they get more than one attack a round (I like the idea of not having as many iterative attacks as in 3E). But perhaps most of all, they have large numbers of combat points. I agree with you here. Minions are an interesting idea but in the end, they just feel a little flimsy to me with that 1 hit point. They encourage unrealistic metagaming which takes me out of the gameworld too easily. However, there should always be a place for such creatures/mooks/minions. For me such creatures should just have hit points (no combat points). They still have skills they can freely use, they are in their way as tough as a non-minion (with no combat points, but the same number of hit points), but when you strike them, it hurts them from the get go. Best Regards Herremann the Wise [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Hit Points - A Discussion of a "Solution"
Top