Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4628879" data-attributes="member: 18280">You will note, I hope, that I am objecting to an erroneous view of the other side (i.e., believing that all damage represents some amount of physical injury =/= believing that hit points are not an abstract concept), not jumping into an argument about what hit points or healing surges represent.We have been there and done that.As I have said, I don't find the concept problematic -- RCFG uses the concept, after all, as I stated in the other thread as well -- only the execution of that concept.And half a dozen EN Worlders in the other thread offered simple, elegant means to make that concept work without having to rewrite all of 4e.EN Worlders are awesome.And post #63 was awesome, too, regardless of whatever you might have chosen to read into it.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />RC</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 4628879, member: 18280"] You will note, I hope, that I am objecting to an erroneous view of the other side (i.e., believing that all damage represents some amount of physical injury =/= believing that hit points are not an abstract concept), not jumping into an argument about what hit points or healing surges represent. We have been there and done that. As I have said, I don't find the concept problematic -- RCFG uses the concept, after all, as I stated in the other thread as well -- only the execution of that concept. And half a dozen EN Worlders in the other thread offered simple, elegant means to make that concept work without having to rewrite all of 4e. EN Worlders are [i][b]awesome[/b][/i][b][/b]. And post #63 was awesome, too, regardless of whatever you might have chosen to read into it. ;) RC [/QUOTE]

Verification