Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mercutio01" data-source="post: 5923101" data-attributes="member: 37277">Why is "relying on magical healing" equate to "stronger non-magical healing"? What is the rationale there?So, the answer is for me to play the game I've been playing for 30 years in a different manner? Why not just tell me to go play a different game?What do you mean don't describe every hit as a "hit"? WTF is a "hit" then when I roll an attack check that "hits"?The SYSTEM itself describes hits as "hits" and says that hit points represent physical damage. And when you roll an attack that hits, you do "damage." EVEN the lead designer and the creator of D&D have said that hit points represent some portion of physical damage.You mean to tell me you don't ever play a game where a hit roll actually hits a character? If that's the case, then your game is the outlier, even among the natural healing fanatics I've seen here and everywhere else.What you're telling me is that I need to ignore the system, the system's rules, and the system's advice and house rule everything to run a game the way you prefer, and not in accordance with the actual text of every edition of the game, including 4E?Take that advice and keep it to yourself, because it's neither helpful nor correct. Keep your "BADWRONGFUN" crap in your own head.</blockquote>