Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
HM's Carrion Crown AP - CT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="perrinmiller" data-source="post: 5511873" data-attributes="member: 88649"><p>Yeah, I use spoiler blocks to keep things clean. OOC threads are good for keeping these kind of discussions from cluttering the IC action (saving us from having to go back too far to look things up). From LPF, I have found I prefer having a separate OOC thread, but even when you do have one, people tend to post OOC only content anyway. But I think everyone here has been good about not doing that so far.</p><p></p><p>Until now, I reserved judgement on the separate CT and I have found the one thing I really dislike about it. We are in a holding pattern waiting on the DM to summarize the action in our role-playing thread when we are all ready to go without needing it (since we all know what happened already). This is why I haven't posted IC for Firvin.</p><p></p><p>My style works well with having combat in the primary IC thread, so I don't feel a need for a separate thread, myself. I always write the role-playing version anyway, putting mechanics into a spoiler block, as a DM and as a player. You all (well, maybe not SK) have seen the result of my style's evolution with my LPF game. In fact because the CT is not really role-playing, I haven't been writing much IC content for that reason, normally I would be posting as I do with Borric and Ariel.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, I agree with GlassEye for the most part, but I will go with the flow if HM wants to keep using it. I can keep track of multiple threads (multiple scenes too). I think the CT works well when certain players only provide posts with mechanics during combat. I know of several players that do that, but this crew doesn't have them, so I think we can run combat in the IC thread and leave it clean (all OOC content in spoiler blocks) with people writing IC content describing their character's actions. </p><p></p><p>BTW, I am not bashing HM (or Thanee either) for this idea. It has its place for certain groups of players. I just don't think it is needed for us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="perrinmiller, post: 5511873, member: 88649"] Yeah, I use spoiler blocks to keep things clean. OOC threads are good for keeping these kind of discussions from cluttering the IC action (saving us from having to go back too far to look things up). From LPF, I have found I prefer having a separate OOC thread, but even when you do have one, people tend to post OOC only content anyway. But I think everyone here has been good about not doing that so far. Until now, I reserved judgement on the separate CT and I have found the one thing I really dislike about it. We are in a holding pattern waiting on the DM to summarize the action in our role-playing thread when we are all ready to go without needing it (since we all know what happened already). This is why I haven't posted IC for Firvin. My style works well with having combat in the primary IC thread, so I don't feel a need for a separate thread, myself. I always write the role-playing version anyway, putting mechanics into a spoiler block, as a DM and as a player. You all (well, maybe not SK) have seen the result of my style's evolution with my LPF game. In fact because the CT is not really role-playing, I haven't been writing much IC content for that reason, normally I would be posting as I do with Borric and Ariel. Bottom line, I agree with GlassEye for the most part, but I will go with the flow if HM wants to keep using it. I can keep track of multiple threads (multiple scenes too). I think the CT works well when certain players only provide posts with mechanics during combat. I know of several players that do that, but this crew doesn't have them, so I think we can run combat in the IC thread and leave it clean (all OOC content in spoiler blocks) with people writing IC content describing their character's actions. BTW, I am not bashing HM (or Thanee either) for this idea. It has its place for certain groups of players. I just don't think it is needed for us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
HM's Carrion Crown AP - CT
Top