Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Hobbit review thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 6233132" data-attributes="member: 58416"><p>To some extent, I was disappointed by The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug. I still enjoyed the movie. I thought it was really good up until they introduced Legolas; at that point, I feel it started to go sharply down hill. (Though the barrel scene shortly after the elves come into the story was pretty cool.)</p><p></p><p>I don't want to go into detail for fear of spoiling the movie for someone else, but I can say that I felt Legolas kinda stole the movie, but not in a good way. I think it took something away from the movie and the story of the dwarves to have him there. Also, there are some changes to the interactions between Bilbo and Smaug which I feel weren't as good as they could have been.</p><p></p><p>I also feel that some of the choices for how Jackson chose to tie Hobbit more closely to Lord of The Rings were (imo) somewhat poorly executed. Which is odd when I think about it because there is a scene with Gandalf which is actually pretty cool, but it doesn't really fit with the rest of the story. I'm not someone who feels you need to stick fast to the book. I understand that some things work better in a different medium. I also understand that Peter Jackson wanted to make some changes to tie The Hobbit to Lord of The Rings more (and I support the idea and theory behind doing so,) I just don't believe his choices for what he changed and how he changed them worked very well. I loved the first part of story which I saw last year, but, while I liked Desolation of Smaug, I left it not feeling nearly as excited about the upcoming third movie as I thought I would be.</p><p></p><p>A lot of people have said they felt Smaug "stole the movie." I disagree; I actually think the presentation of Smaug was a let down. As I've alluded to already, I didn't like the changes made to the interactions between Bilbo and Smaug; I feel it made Smaug far less cerebral than he was in the book. There were also some things which really didn't make sense. For example, how did Smaug smell Bilbo and know where he was -despite not knowing what Hobbits smell like, yet not notice the Dwarves at all -whom we know he knows the smell of because that's the whole reason for Bilbo being there- even when they were literally right under him? To me, the movie downgraded Smaug from a major villain and major part into something second rate which will only serve to be a speed bump on the way to the Battle of Five Armies. To me, the second half of the movie was really weak.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 6233132, member: 58416"] To some extent, I was disappointed by The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug. I still enjoyed the movie. I thought it was really good up until they introduced Legolas; at that point, I feel it started to go sharply down hill. (Though the barrel scene shortly after the elves come into the story was pretty cool.) I don't want to go into detail for fear of spoiling the movie for someone else, but I can say that I felt Legolas kinda stole the movie, but not in a good way. I think it took something away from the movie and the story of the dwarves to have him there. Also, there are some changes to the interactions between Bilbo and Smaug which I feel weren't as good as they could have been. I also feel that some of the choices for how Jackson chose to tie Hobbit more closely to Lord of The Rings were (imo) somewhat poorly executed. Which is odd when I think about it because there is a scene with Gandalf which is actually pretty cool, but it doesn't really fit with the rest of the story. I'm not someone who feels you need to stick fast to the book. I understand that some things work better in a different medium. I also understand that Peter Jackson wanted to make some changes to tie The Hobbit to Lord of The Rings more (and I support the idea and theory behind doing so,) I just don't believe his choices for what he changed and how he changed them worked very well. I loved the first part of story which I saw last year, but, while I liked Desolation of Smaug, I left it not feeling nearly as excited about the upcoming third movie as I thought I would be. A lot of people have said they felt Smaug "stole the movie." I disagree; I actually think the presentation of Smaug was a let down. As I've alluded to already, I didn't like the changes made to the interactions between Bilbo and Smaug; I feel it made Smaug far less cerebral than he was in the book. There were also some things which really didn't make sense. For example, how did Smaug smell Bilbo and know where he was -despite not knowing what Hobbits smell like, yet not notice the Dwarves at all -whom we know he knows the smell of because that's the whole reason for Bilbo being there- even when they were literally right under him? To me, the movie downgraded Smaug from a major villain and major part into something second rate which will only serve to be a speed bump on the way to the Battle of Five Armies. To me, the second half of the movie was really weak. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Hobbit review thread
Top