Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hold Person and Polymorph
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iku Rex" data-source="post: 1792466" data-attributes="member: 752"><p>I appreciate the effort, but I don't think you understood Scion either. </p><p></p><p>Where? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> Did he edit his posts at some point, replacing that simple question with the nonsense currently on display? </p><p></p><p></p><p>And why on earth would he ask me that? Where do I suggest or imply that I am using the term in some special, non-standard way? </p><p></p><p>Not to mention; what I think is self evident or not is completely irrelevant to my questions, as they involve <em>Hypersmurf's</em> idea of "self evident". </p><p></p><p>(Or is he trying to say that <em>nothing</em> is self evident in the rules?! And therefore my question is absurd?)</p><p>No. (I'll pretend the answer was "yes" for the sake of argument.)</p><p>Yes. </p><p></p><p>(I'm not sure if "self evident" is the right term with regards to your questions, but I'll play along.) </p><p></p><p>My turn: Is it self evident that the shillelagh spell (duration: 1 min./level) is <strong>not</strong> supposed to end (or get suppressed) the second you cast it? </p><p></p><p>IMO the answer is "yes". Hypersmurf presumably thinks the answer is "yes", or he wouldn't keep bringing up shillelagh as an example. I'll even go out on a limb and predict that you too will say that the answer is "yes". </p><p></p><p>The difference is that anyone sufficiently intelligent to read a DnD rulebook will understand that shillelagh <em>doesn't</em> end when you cast it. It's not "unclear" in any way.</p><p></p><p>What to we have to do? Had there been such a general rule, it would apply unless some rule said "general rule X does not apply here" OR it was clearly absurd for it to apply. </p><p>Does the Eschew Materials feat let you cast a spell with a cheap material component without possessing that component? Remember, the "Magic" chapter clearly says that you need to possess a spells's material component to cast it. And nowhere in the feat does it say that this general rule no longer applies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iku Rex, post: 1792466, member: 752"] I appreciate the effort, but I don't think you understood Scion either. Where? :confused: Did he edit his posts at some point, replacing that simple question with the nonsense currently on display? And why on earth would he ask me that? Where do I suggest or imply that I am using the term in some special, non-standard way? Not to mention; what I think is self evident or not is completely irrelevant to my questions, as they involve [i]Hypersmurf's[/i] idea of "self evident". (Or is he trying to say that [i]nothing[/i] is self evident in the rules?! And therefore my question is absurd?) No. (I'll pretend the answer was "yes" for the sake of argument.) Yes. (I'm not sure if "self evident" is the right term with regards to your questions, but I'll play along.) My turn: Is it self evident that the shillelagh spell (duration: 1 min./level) is [b]not[/b] supposed to end (or get suppressed) the second you cast it? IMO the answer is "yes". Hypersmurf presumably thinks the answer is "yes", or he wouldn't keep bringing up shillelagh as an example. I'll even go out on a limb and predict that you too will say that the answer is "yes". The difference is that anyone sufficiently intelligent to read a DnD rulebook will understand that shillelagh [i]doesn't[/i] end when you cast it. It's not "unclear" in any way. What to we have to do? Had there been such a general rule, it would apply unless some rule said "general rule X does not apply here" OR it was clearly absurd for it to apply. Does the Eschew Materials feat let you cast a spell with a cheap material component without possessing that component? Remember, the "Magic" chapter clearly says that you need to possess a spells's material component to cast it. And nowhere in the feat does it say that this general rule no longer applies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hold Person and Polymorph
Top