Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hold Person vs Boots of Flying
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LokiDR" data-source="post: 940507" data-attributes="member: 6239"><p>Yes, the debate is whether control of the flight spell is physical or mental action.</p><p></p><p>The spell physically moves you: irrelevant. Purely mental actions in a world of magic can cause physical movement.</p><p></p><p>Fly requires a move-equivelant action to move a person: irrelevant. That is only a measure of the kind of time and concentration the spell requires to use. See flaming sphere.</p><p></p><p>So what does fly need? What does it say it needs? It only requires concentration in the spell description. Concentration is a mental action. Hence fly is a mental action. Can I make that any clearer?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your silent teleport has moved you. Change in position over time. Your explanation does not explain telekinisis. Mine does. Are you saying you can't use a spell-like ability of telekinisis to pick yourself up and move your body by virtue of the spell?</p><p></p><p>The end result is meaningless. We have been saying this all along, but that is all you have focused on.</p><p></p><p>Hold is meant to be paralasis, not some dimensia that you can't move.</p><p></p><p>The question then is whether controling fly is a mental or physical action. See above.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What does the fly spell require?</p><p>What movements of body would be impossible?</p><p></p><p>You are taking rule segments out of context and trying to build an arguement around it. This bothers me. There is no rule that calls use of the fly spell "physical movement". You are using english and somatics. I am looking at the description of the fly spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In no place does the description of Enchantment:Compulsion state that it changes the thoughts of the target. A dominated person doesn't want to do those things they are commanded to do, but they are commpelled to do them. Spells do only what they say they do. A compulsion spell can change the way a person's mind works, and one way that can be visualized is disabling the motor centers of the brain and spinal cord. This is a visualization of altering the way a mind works, but it is consistant with the description of the compulsion sub-school and the Hold Person spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think allowing use of the fly spell while under hold person is a house rule. I think stopping a person in mid-air with hold person is a house rule.</p><p></p><p>By the way, if things really were that open to interpretation, no house rules would be neccessary unless a clarification of this situation was published. House rules contradict published rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LokiDR, post: 940507, member: 6239"] Yes, the debate is whether control of the flight spell is physical or mental action. The spell physically moves you: irrelevant. Purely mental actions in a world of magic can cause physical movement. Fly requires a move-equivelant action to move a person: irrelevant. That is only a measure of the kind of time and concentration the spell requires to use. See flaming sphere. So what does fly need? What does it say it needs? It only requires concentration in the spell description. Concentration is a mental action. Hence fly is a mental action. Can I make that any clearer? Your silent teleport has moved you. Change in position over time. Your explanation does not explain telekinisis. Mine does. Are you saying you can't use a spell-like ability of telekinisis to pick yourself up and move your body by virtue of the spell? The end result is meaningless. We have been saying this all along, but that is all you have focused on. Hold is meant to be paralasis, not some dimensia that you can't move. The question then is whether controling fly is a mental or physical action. See above. What does the fly spell require? What movements of body would be impossible? You are taking rule segments out of context and trying to build an arguement around it. This bothers me. There is no rule that calls use of the fly spell "physical movement". You are using english and somatics. I am looking at the description of the fly spell. In no place does the description of Enchantment:Compulsion state that it changes the thoughts of the target. A dominated person doesn't want to do those things they are commanded to do, but they are commpelled to do them. Spells do only what they say they do. A compulsion spell can change the way a person's mind works, and one way that can be visualized is disabling the motor centers of the brain and spinal cord. This is a visualization of altering the way a mind works, but it is consistant with the description of the compulsion sub-school and the Hold Person spell. I don't think allowing use of the fly spell while under hold person is a house rule. I think stopping a person in mid-air with hold person is a house rule. By the way, if things really were that open to interpretation, no house rules would be neccessary unless a clarification of this situation was published. House rules contradict published rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hold Person vs Boots of Flying
Top