Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Hollywood just doesn't get it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowdancer" data-source="post: 2459831" data-attributes="member: 515"><p>Ummm, no they didn't. Critics in the '70s pretty muched geeked all over themselves when Star Wars came out. They did the same thing for FotR. FotR was one of the best-reviewed movies of that year.</p><p> </p><p>I also think <em>good</em> critics help steer audiences to <em>good</em> non-traditional movies, like Passion of the Christ. That is their most-important function.</p><p> </p><p>In addition to RottenTomatoes, I would recommend going to metacritic.com. It is another site which compiles a large number of critics' reviews and ratings. It then assigns a grade to the movie ranging from 100 to zero. I find it to be a pretty good reflection of the overall quality of a movie.</p><p> </p><p>Finding a critic whose opinion you agree with is also good advice. When I write a review for the newspaper I work for, I hope I am able to steer some people with tastes similar to mine toward some movies they might otherwise not see. But I also realize not everyone is going to like all of the movies I like, or dislike all of the movies I dislike. Everyone's different, and everyone has different tastes.</p><p> </p><p>As for the movie reviewers who take payoffs for giving positive reviews -- yeah, it happens. They are called "tout whores" -- they will tout any movie to the masses in exchange for something they perceive as being of significance. Many of them work for small-market radio and TV stations, or low-circulation newspapers in California or the Northeast. Most are just hoping that someone with a studio connection will like what they write and give them a (better-paying) job. Some just want to see their name included on the posters and ads, thinking it will help them get a better job or at least a job in a bigger market that pays better. Some secretly hope they will get picked by a network to appear on TV regularly like Ebert or Rex Reed or Gene Shallot. Some just like being flown to premieres and press junkets so they can hobnob with the stars. And most have no training in critical analysis, and wouldn't know a good movie if they saw it unless some studio PR hack tells them it's good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowdancer, post: 2459831, member: 515"] Ummm, no they didn't. Critics in the '70s pretty muched geeked all over themselves when Star Wars came out. They did the same thing for FotR. FotR was one of the best-reviewed movies of that year. I also think [i]good[/i] critics help steer audiences to [i]good[/i] non-traditional movies, like Passion of the Christ. That is their most-important function. In addition to RottenTomatoes, I would recommend going to metacritic.com. It is another site which compiles a large number of critics' reviews and ratings. It then assigns a grade to the movie ranging from 100 to zero. I find it to be a pretty good reflection of the overall quality of a movie. Finding a critic whose opinion you agree with is also good advice. When I write a review for the newspaper I work for, I hope I am able to steer some people with tastes similar to mine toward some movies they might otherwise not see. But I also realize not everyone is going to like all of the movies I like, or dislike all of the movies I dislike. Everyone's different, and everyone has different tastes. As for the movie reviewers who take payoffs for giving positive reviews -- yeah, it happens. They are called "tout whores" -- they will tout any movie to the masses in exchange for something they perceive as being of significance. Many of them work for small-market radio and TV stations, or low-circulation newspapers in California or the Northeast. Most are just hoping that someone with a studio connection will like what they write and give them a (better-paying) job. Some just want to see their name included on the posters and ads, thinking it will help them get a better job or at least a job in a bigger market that pays better. Some secretly hope they will get picked by a network to appear on TV regularly like Ebert or Rex Reed or Gene Shallot. Some just like being flown to premieres and press junkets so they can hobnob with the stars. And most have no training in critical analysis, and wouldn't know a good movie if they saw it unless some studio PR hack tells them it's good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Hollywood just doesn't get it
Top