Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Home-brewing Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Traveon Wyvernspur" data-source="post: 5698062" data-attributes="member: 73201"><p>I may have phrased it a bit weirdly, but what I meant was if you have all the various options available from the original rulebooks, official player option books, and other 3rd party splat would you still be going RAW using these sources or still go with home-brewing rules not contained within these resources.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's cool, a lot of DM's do it this way and that is an interpretation issue not a home-brew ruling thing unless you are changing something in the RAW which would change some mechanics in your game. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I kind of covered this in my first quote of you, which is what I was clarifying. Splat/non-core are different from home-brewing in my opinion. The question at hand is more about if you change things that aren't in these types of books.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is how I do it when I home-brew as well, if players agree to play in my games and I have certain things I like to change I tell them ahead of time and if other things need to change during the course of the game I will discuss with them. I feel that everyone at the table should have input if something during the game changes and I will not implement if they think (as a majority of players) that it is unfair, silly, or absurd.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you took me too literally there, what I meant by that option was that you make all decisions, without any player input ever, and if they don't like it that they can go find another table to sit at because the way you do things is the only way. Being the final arbiter of the rules is not about being god, it's about being well-informed and sticking to what you think is the right call as a judge or referee. That's how I've always felt it should be done that the DM is the rules-judge and players can attempt to sway the judge in their favor if they come up with a good argument on a rule that may be in a "grey area."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Traveon Wyvernspur, post: 5698062, member: 73201"] I may have phrased it a bit weirdly, but what I meant was if you have all the various options available from the original rulebooks, official player option books, and other 3rd party splat would you still be going RAW using these sources or still go with home-brewing rules not contained within these resources. That's cool, a lot of DM's do it this way and that is an interpretation issue not a home-brew ruling thing unless you are changing something in the RAW which would change some mechanics in your game. I kind of covered this in my first quote of you, which is what I was clarifying. Splat/non-core are different from home-brewing in my opinion. The question at hand is more about if you change things that aren't in these types of books. This is how I do it when I home-brew as well, if players agree to play in my games and I have certain things I like to change I tell them ahead of time and if other things need to change during the course of the game I will discuss with them. I feel that everyone at the table should have input if something during the game changes and I will not implement if they think (as a majority of players) that it is unfair, silly, or absurd. I think you took me too literally there, what I meant by that option was that you make all decisions, without any player input ever, and if they don't like it that they can go find another table to sit at because the way you do things is the only way. Being the final arbiter of the rules is not about being god, it's about being well-informed and sticking to what you think is the right call as a judge or referee. That's how I've always felt it should be done that the DM is the rules-judge and players can attempt to sway the judge in their favor if they come up with a good argument on a rule that may be in a "grey area." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Home-brewing Rules
Top