Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="touc" data-source="post: 8132111" data-attributes="member: 19270">Interesting idea. We originally had all spells at d10, but it seemed to penalize casters who did have that arsenal of &quot;quick&quot; spells. That would speed things up.Also an interesting idea. <s>The danger would be that it could make effects where the save occurs during the victim's turn, like &quot;hold person,&quot; more deadly in that they would tend to last longer.</s> EDIT: actually not a problem if you track effects on the initiative they occur (e.g. if hold person tags you on initiative 6, you save on initiative 6 next round...then if they saved, they could act, albeit end of round with their &quot;if I get free&quot; declaration.)The d20 (we've bounced between a d12 and d20) gives a small chance the player might act during the 1-10 count that others would. But, will definitely take a look.Yes.Found it easier to count up in groups (e.g. 1-3, 4-6, anyone higher?) than down.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="touc, post: 8132111, member: 19270"] Interesting idea. We originally had all spells at d10, but it seemed to penalize casters who did have that arsenal of "quick" spells. That would speed things up. Also an interesting idea. [S]The danger would be that it could make effects where the save occurs during the victim's turn, like "hold person," more deadly in that they would tend to last longer.[/S] EDIT: actually not a problem if you track effects on the initiative they occur (e.g. if hold person tags you on initiative 6, you save on initiative 6 next round...then if they saved, they could act, albeit end of round with their "if I get free" declaration.) The d20 (we've bounced between a d12 and d20) gives a small chance the player might act during the 1-10 count that others would. But, will definitely take a look. Yes. Found it easier to count up in groups (e.g. 1-3, 4-6, anyone higher?) than down. [/QUOTE]

Verification