Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Homebrew settings and player appeal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GuardianLurker" data-source="post: 3118865" data-attributes="member: 786"><p><strong>From the opposite end...</strong></p><p></p><p>I'm a homebrew DM. Other have covered all the responses I could give on that point as well, or better, than I. I also play.</p><p></p><p>I *prefer* to play in homebrews. Because, contrary to your original post, I've found that it's the GMs who rely on published settings who are lazy. After all, from the GM perspective, that's what using a prepublished setting does - it *spares* you effort. I've found time and again that "published setting" GMs are less invested in the setting, and thus in the game. Which detracts from *my* enjoyment.</p><p></p><p>I also enjoy seeing other people's homebrews. I learn and get inspired by them. Plus, it tells me a lot about the kind of campaign the GM runs, and what I can expect.</p><p></p><p>I've also run into another problem - I'm very much a run and find out player, and I'll read up on as much background info as I can (that relates to my character). This has caused problems. Example: I played in an FR campaign based in the Silvery Marches. On pure random chance, I had my character be from Silverymoon. Then when "Silver Marches" came out, I bought the book and read up on Silverymoon. Just as I had read up on FR in general. This caused my GM problems, because (unbeknownst to me) he considered some of the info (rightly or wrongly) as priviliged info. Which I now knew, because I hadn't known it was out-of-bounds beforehand. When I found out, I of course promptly put the info in the "Meta-game OOC Do Not Touch" folder. But it still caused a problem. And I've run into that response more than once.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't mean that I buy and read the adventures, but I do consider setting supplements to be fair game. Basically, I get miffed if my GM gets miffed that I did my research. </p><p></p><p>And, of course, if I'm forbidden from getting those supplements, I might as well be playing a homebrew setting anyway.</p><p></p><p>The upshot is that I've had many more poor RPG experiences in campaigns using published settings than I have otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GuardianLurker, post: 3118865, member: 786"] [b]From the opposite end...[/b] I'm a homebrew DM. Other have covered all the responses I could give on that point as well, or better, than I. I also play. I *prefer* to play in homebrews. Because, contrary to your original post, I've found that it's the GMs who rely on published settings who are lazy. After all, from the GM perspective, that's what using a prepublished setting does - it *spares* you effort. I've found time and again that "published setting" GMs are less invested in the setting, and thus in the game. Which detracts from *my* enjoyment. I also enjoy seeing other people's homebrews. I learn and get inspired by them. Plus, it tells me a lot about the kind of campaign the GM runs, and what I can expect. I've also run into another problem - I'm very much a run and find out player, and I'll read up on as much background info as I can (that relates to my character). This has caused problems. Example: I played in an FR campaign based in the Silvery Marches. On pure random chance, I had my character be from Silverymoon. Then when "Silver Marches" came out, I bought the book and read up on Silverymoon. Just as I had read up on FR in general. This caused my GM problems, because (unbeknownst to me) he considered some of the info (rightly or wrongly) as priviliged info. Which I now knew, because I hadn't known it was out-of-bounds beforehand. When I found out, I of course promptly put the info in the "Meta-game OOC Do Not Touch" folder. But it still caused a problem. And I've run into that response more than once. This doesn't mean that I buy and read the adventures, but I do consider setting supplements to be fair game. Basically, I get miffed if my GM gets miffed that I did my research. And, of course, if I'm forbidden from getting those supplements, I might as well be playing a homebrew setting anyway. The upshot is that I've had many more poor RPG experiences in campaigns using published settings than I have otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Homebrew settings and player appeal
Top