Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Homosexuality in the Forgotten Realms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dragonlordofpoondari" data-source="post: 3670232" data-attributes="member: 42088"><p>Big undulating flag.</p><p> </p><p>In fact, social scientists are uniquely equipped to conduct these interview-based studies since that is precisely the kind of research in which they specialize. It is what they go to graduate school to train for, and it is part and parcel of the social scientist's career.</p><p></p><p>As far as biologists go, population ecologists & bioinformatitions tend to be good at statistics, but I've encountered an alarming number of PhDs at the upper echelon of biology (we're talking Howard Hughes Labs, Academy members' labs, top graduate/medical schools etc) who can barely calculate <em>standard deviation</em>. Some of them can't even calculate molarity to mix up their own solutions!!! That was what, freshman chemistry? Sad but true. </p><p></p><p>[RANT FOLLOWS]</p><p></p><p>What's more, I won't go into the amount of faked data I've seen published in top journals because the stakes are so damned high in biology (I'm talking about money, here, folks). I wish this was hyperbole, but the funding system in science today almost encourages faking data if your repuation and lab budget and survival depend on it. Funding is based on big ideas, big phenotypes, and following through to make the big discoveries ... instead of negative results which are a normal and healthy part of practicing good science.</p><p></p><p>Even if a paper comes out of a Nobel laureate's lab, you can't trust it until the experiments are repeated by an impartial 3rd party. Unfortunately, double-checking the experiments of others doesn't garner kleos (honor) like doing your own cutting edge research. It is just not sexy research and therefore not a huge priority. So faked data often won't get caught for years. Ug.</p><p></p><p>At least the scientific method is noble in intent ...</p><p></p><p>[/RANT]</p><p></p><p>My point here? Don't believe everything you read ... even if it's coming from a very reputable source. Politics are everywhere.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dragonlordofpoondari, post: 3670232, member: 42088"] Big undulating flag. In fact, social scientists are uniquely equipped to conduct these interview-based studies since that is precisely the kind of research in which they specialize. It is what they go to graduate school to train for, and it is part and parcel of the social scientist's career. As far as biologists go, population ecologists & bioinformatitions tend to be good at statistics, but I've encountered an alarming number of PhDs at the upper echelon of biology (we're talking Howard Hughes Labs, Academy members' labs, top graduate/medical schools etc) who can barely calculate [I]standard deviation[/I]. Some of them can't even calculate molarity to mix up their own solutions!!! That was what, freshman chemistry? Sad but true. [RANT FOLLOWS] What's more, I won't go into the amount of faked data I've seen published in top journals because the stakes are so damned high in biology (I'm talking about money, here, folks). I wish this was hyperbole, but the funding system in science today almost encourages faking data if your repuation and lab budget and survival depend on it. Funding is based on big ideas, big phenotypes, and following through to make the big discoveries ... instead of negative results which are a normal and healthy part of practicing good science. Even if a paper comes out of a Nobel laureate's lab, you can't trust it until the experiments are repeated by an impartial 3rd party. Unfortunately, double-checking the experiments of others doesn't garner kleos (honor) like doing your own cutting edge research. It is just not sexy research and therefore not a huge priority. So faked data often won't get caught for years. Ug. At least the scientific method is noble in intent ... [/RANT] My point here? Don't believe everything you read ... even if it's coming from a very reputable source. Politics are everywhere. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Homosexuality in the Forgotten Realms
Top