Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Honestly, how often have you used gnomes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ifurita'sFan" data-source="post: 3914587" data-attributes="member: 57656"><p>I'll agree with that and let me add an apology to the original poster for being rude. </p><p></p><p>That said, I stand by my argument that the statement that Gnomes have no place in a fantasy world just doesn't track. Gnomes are, and have been a part of our shared and combined western fantasy heritage for centuries. They most certainly have a place in fantasy worlds... right alongside elves, and the rest. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There hasn't been a distinctly Gnomish role because they (Hasbro and WotC) chose not to allow them one... not because it couldn't exist. </p><p></p><p>Tieflings and Dragon born would likewise have not had a role if they hadn't been given one... neither one in fact really inspire me to believe they fit with the character classes they are archityped for. And the fact that they're now going to be canon races is mind boggling since neither of these "races" have any role in western mythology (or any other mythology for that matter). </p><p></p><p>The problem here is that using 3rd edition's choice (to eliminate a distinctly Gnomish role by virtue of nerfing what were previously their defining abilities) to justify how 4th edition should be... Well... that means that 3rd edition is wrong by extension...because it didn't use 2nd edition's outlook on gnomes (If you use one editions view to justify views in a later edition, then you must use even earlier editions to justify or condemn later editions as well)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Barbarians and Thieves... </p><p></p><p>Thieves I can understand... thats a given. </p><p></p><p>Barbarians though? That's just too cool to pass up commenting on. There's some real role playing gold in that one I can feel it.</p><p>"I am Comer the Barbarian Gnome... *flex flex* After many moons as a chartered accountant I heard the call of my wild heart and embraced my inner rage."</p><p></p><p>As to the rest... I'm not holding my breath on Gnomes finding their way back into the game if they are excluded like this. One of the lead developers is Rich Baker... after Birthright I think scepticism of his work is justified.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ifurita'sFan, post: 3914587, member: 57656"] I'll agree with that and let me add an apology to the original poster for being rude. That said, I stand by my argument that the statement that Gnomes have no place in a fantasy world just doesn't track. Gnomes are, and have been a part of our shared and combined western fantasy heritage for centuries. They most certainly have a place in fantasy worlds... right alongside elves, and the rest. There hasn't been a distinctly Gnomish role because they (Hasbro and WotC) chose not to allow them one... not because it couldn't exist. Tieflings and Dragon born would likewise have not had a role if they hadn't been given one... neither one in fact really inspire me to believe they fit with the character classes they are archityped for. And the fact that they're now going to be canon races is mind boggling since neither of these "races" have any role in western mythology (or any other mythology for that matter). The problem here is that using 3rd edition's choice (to eliminate a distinctly Gnomish role by virtue of nerfing what were previously their defining abilities) to justify how 4th edition should be... Well... that means that 3rd edition is wrong by extension...because it didn't use 2nd edition's outlook on gnomes (If you use one editions view to justify views in a later edition, then you must use even earlier editions to justify or condemn later editions as well) Barbarians and Thieves... Thieves I can understand... thats a given. Barbarians though? That's just too cool to pass up commenting on. There's some real role playing gold in that one I can feel it. "I am Comer the Barbarian Gnome... *flex flex* After many moons as a chartered accountant I heard the call of my wild heart and embraced my inner rage." As to the rest... I'm not holding my breath on Gnomes finding their way back into the game if they are excluded like this. One of the lead developers is Rich Baker... after Birthright I think scepticism of his work is justified. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Honestly, how often have you used gnomes?
Top