Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Honestly - What is Eragon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 3119868" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>First off, Icy Cool: As you said you didn't read all the posts in this thread, you may not be aware that I answered many of the questions you asked. Feel free to ask follow-up questions after reading.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You and I were the ones conversing. I took "anyone" to include me, which is why I believed I should explain why I had the ability to make such a statement.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As is writing. This is where you and I disagree. Many people buy and wear poorly made shoes, just like many people buy and read poorly written books. Many surgeries result in infections and complications after the fact because of sloppy work by the surgeon, but in the mind of the patient, it's still a success.</p><p></p><p>The other key thing to note here, as I've seen several notes about romance novels and "Aha, but don't some people think all fantasy is bad?", is that you have to judge each novel within the context of its intended genre. When I read a mystery novel, I don't complain if it's the same plot I've seen countless other times. When I read a romance novel, I don't complain that the conversations go on longer than they would in a fantasy novel. (And yes, I do read both of those genres as well, although neither as much as fantasy.)</p><p></p><p>By fantasy-novel standards, Eragon is bad. Now, people have made the good point that it's being sold as YA-lit, which demands different standards, and it's entirely possible that by those standards, it's merely mediocre. Heck, it's possible that Eragon is a very good book -- from the context of "Books to be read by children with no previous exposure to fantasy literature." That's a discussion worth having, I think. Trying to figure out what audience would be right for a given book is useful.</p><p></p><p>I think what really aggravates me about the "there's no real standard" argument is that it largely invalidates conversation. We might as well just have a poll for each book ("Did you like it?") instead of a conversation thread, since any discussion of character, plot structure, setting, and voice is just subjective according to your theory.</p><p></p><p>A question for you, Merilon -- and I mean this seriously. I'm not trying to shoo you away, and I want that clear:</p><p></p><p>You've said that the only meaningful standard of judgment is the reader's personal opinion.</p><p>You've said that you yourself haven't read the book.</p><p></p><p>Why are you posting in this thread?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 3119868, member: 5171"] First off, Icy Cool: As you said you didn't read all the posts in this thread, you may not be aware that I answered many of the questions you asked. Feel free to ask follow-up questions after reading. You and I were the ones conversing. I took "anyone" to include me, which is why I believed I should explain why I had the ability to make such a statement. As is writing. This is where you and I disagree. Many people buy and wear poorly made shoes, just like many people buy and read poorly written books. Many surgeries result in infections and complications after the fact because of sloppy work by the surgeon, but in the mind of the patient, it's still a success. The other key thing to note here, as I've seen several notes about romance novels and "Aha, but don't some people think all fantasy is bad?", is that you have to judge each novel within the context of its intended genre. When I read a mystery novel, I don't complain if it's the same plot I've seen countless other times. When I read a romance novel, I don't complain that the conversations go on longer than they would in a fantasy novel. (And yes, I do read both of those genres as well, although neither as much as fantasy.) By fantasy-novel standards, Eragon is bad. Now, people have made the good point that it's being sold as YA-lit, which demands different standards, and it's entirely possible that by those standards, it's merely mediocre. Heck, it's possible that Eragon is a very good book -- from the context of "Books to be read by children with no previous exposure to fantasy literature." That's a discussion worth having, I think. Trying to figure out what audience would be right for a given book is useful. I think what really aggravates me about the "there's no real standard" argument is that it largely invalidates conversation. We might as well just have a poll for each book ("Did you like it?") instead of a conversation thread, since any discussion of character, plot structure, setting, and voice is just subjective according to your theory. A question for you, Merilon -- and I mean this seriously. I'm not trying to shoo you away, and I want that clear: You've said that the only meaningful standard of judgment is the reader's personal opinion. You've said that you yourself haven't read the book. Why are you posting in this thread? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Honestly - What is Eragon?
Top