Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Honor & Sanity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="halfling rogue" data-source="post: 6470441" data-attributes="member: 6779182"><p>I can understand where you are coming from, except when you say it is a racist stereotype. If a white American/European thinks of another ethnic group as 'honorable', even if it is mislabeled, how can you call it racist? It might be a stereotype, but it certainly isn't a <em>racist</em> stereotype.</p><p></p><p>And that's the thing. Fantasy excels in stereotype. One might even make the argument that Fantasy requires stereotypes and once the stereotypes are removed then it no longer remains Fantasy. This is because stereotypes are actually symbols that speak to deeper truths that we cannot adequately relate in words. This, truly, is the almost unspeakable, hard-to-explainable draw that so many experience to Fantasy. In fact, the thing that troubles me most about the modern take on Fantasy is that in almost every facet it aims at removing stereotypes, to trash the symbols. Look at all of the popular interpretations (or more likely, re-interpretations) of the Fantasy genre in pop culture. Almost every example you will see the deconstruction of stereotypes. Moderns and 'postmoderns' drool over it. </p><p></p><p>Off the top of my head, take the movie "Maleficent" for example (spoilery). The once purely evil Maleficent now has a soft side. She is made into the hero and the king becomes the villain. The show "Once Upon a Time" essentially exists (seemingly) solely for this purpose, to deconstruct stereotypes in Fantasy. They give us a Rambo Snow-white and an angsty Capt. Hook, an evil Peter Pan. A Beast is no longer an actual Beast but a metaphorical beast within. Even Peter Jackson with the many stereotypes found within "Lord of the Rings" couldn't help it in some places. Faramir simply couldn't be as noble as Tolkien wrote him so they made him weak and conflicted, Aragorn, too, to a degree. They even took an extra step (in my opinion) with breaking down stereotypes in the "Hobbit". You'll notice Azog and the goblins of the Misty Mountains are not dark skinned. Another thing (quite small) is that there are residents in Lake-town who are black. I know many who would say I'm being racist just for pointing that out. Say what you will, but the real issue is that those decisions are intentionally made to kick against fairy-tale logic/stereotypes. Maybe the most relevant is that when the art for 5e was released the main thing discussed (before and after) was how stereotypes would/should be/have been broken.</p><p></p><p>I say all of the above, only to point out that Fantasy (or at least how we perceive Fantasy) has shifted in our day. I'm not necessarily saying that it is a bad thing that it has shifted, but I do think we've lost something. It's become less and not more. And (back to the point) one of the things that we've lost is the ability to realize (or speak plainly about) that there is such thing as a good stereotype and that stereotypes help produce good Fantasy. In this case, a culture perceived as "Honorable" is a good stereotype. It might be false to a degree, but every stereotype, when boiled down is false to a degree. The point isn't to dwell on the falseness of the stereotype (unless the stereotype is actually a false one), but to understand the intention of the stereotype within the Fantasy structure. </p><p></p><p>A knight rescuing a damsel in distress is about as stereotypical as you can get, and because of that, many deem it to be sexist. Why can't the damsel rescue the knight? Why should she be a damsel at all? Why shouldn't she be the knight? Why does she have to rescue anyone at all? By the time we're done deconstructing the stereotype we've lost Fantasy. The other problem we now have is that whenever anyone stands up to defend the stereotype, they are instantly lambasted as racist, sexist, or whatever-ist, rather than someone who simply enjoys Fantasy for being Fantasy.</p><p></p><p>So when you get to RPGs and folks participating within Fantasy, and you throw in a dash of that modern deconstructionism in the mix, you get a lot of people talking past each other. All of that to say...imagining Asian cultures as "Honorable" is certainly a stereotype, but it is a good stereotype, especially as a vehicle for Fantasy games. And as such, it is certainly not racist. That's just a flag being waved that gets us off topic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="halfling rogue, post: 6470441, member: 6779182"] I can understand where you are coming from, except when you say it is a racist stereotype. If a white American/European thinks of another ethnic group as 'honorable', even if it is mislabeled, how can you call it racist? It might be a stereotype, but it certainly isn't a [I]racist[/I] stereotype. And that's the thing. Fantasy excels in stereotype. One might even make the argument that Fantasy requires stereotypes and once the stereotypes are removed then it no longer remains Fantasy. This is because stereotypes are actually symbols that speak to deeper truths that we cannot adequately relate in words. This, truly, is the almost unspeakable, hard-to-explainable draw that so many experience to Fantasy. In fact, the thing that troubles me most about the modern take on Fantasy is that in almost every facet it aims at removing stereotypes, to trash the symbols. Look at all of the popular interpretations (or more likely, re-interpretations) of the Fantasy genre in pop culture. Almost every example you will see the deconstruction of stereotypes. Moderns and 'postmoderns' drool over it. Off the top of my head, take the movie "Maleficent" for example (spoilery). The once purely evil Maleficent now has a soft side. She is made into the hero and the king becomes the villain. The show "Once Upon a Time" essentially exists (seemingly) solely for this purpose, to deconstruct stereotypes in Fantasy. They give us a Rambo Snow-white and an angsty Capt. Hook, an evil Peter Pan. A Beast is no longer an actual Beast but a metaphorical beast within. Even Peter Jackson with the many stereotypes found within "Lord of the Rings" couldn't help it in some places. Faramir simply couldn't be as noble as Tolkien wrote him so they made him weak and conflicted, Aragorn, too, to a degree. They even took an extra step (in my opinion) with breaking down stereotypes in the "Hobbit". You'll notice Azog and the goblins of the Misty Mountains are not dark skinned. Another thing (quite small) is that there are residents in Lake-town who are black. I know many who would say I'm being racist just for pointing that out. Say what you will, but the real issue is that those decisions are intentionally made to kick against fairy-tale logic/stereotypes. Maybe the most relevant is that when the art for 5e was released the main thing discussed (before and after) was how stereotypes would/should be/have been broken. I say all of the above, only to point out that Fantasy (or at least how we perceive Fantasy) has shifted in our day. I'm not necessarily saying that it is a bad thing that it has shifted, but I do think we've lost something. It's become less and not more. And (back to the point) one of the things that we've lost is the ability to realize (or speak plainly about) that there is such thing as a good stereotype and that stereotypes help produce good Fantasy. In this case, a culture perceived as "Honorable" is a good stereotype. It might be false to a degree, but every stereotype, when boiled down is false to a degree. The point isn't to dwell on the falseness of the stereotype (unless the stereotype is actually a false one), but to understand the intention of the stereotype within the Fantasy structure. A knight rescuing a damsel in distress is about as stereotypical as you can get, and because of that, many deem it to be sexist. Why can't the damsel rescue the knight? Why should she be a damsel at all? Why shouldn't she be the knight? Why does she have to rescue anyone at all? By the time we're done deconstructing the stereotype we've lost Fantasy. The other problem we now have is that whenever anyone stands up to defend the stereotype, they are instantly lambasted as racist, sexist, or whatever-ist, rather than someone who simply enjoys Fantasy for being Fantasy. So when you get to RPGs and folks participating within Fantasy, and you throw in a dash of that modern deconstructionism in the mix, you get a lot of people talking past each other. All of that to say...imagining Asian cultures as "Honorable" is certainly a stereotype, but it is a good stereotype, especially as a vehicle for Fantasy games. And as such, it is certainly not racist. That's just a flag being waved that gets us off topic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Honor & Sanity
Top