Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hope for Nerath? (On D&D Next Campaign Settings and a Plea to WotC)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 5961896" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>Actually, I was glad of this. One of the things I liked <em>most</em> about PoL-land was that it was left undefined, and so open for the DM to do what he liked with it. I always felt that the more WotC fleshed out the Nentir Vale, the less utility that setting had. (And for those who <em>wanted</em> a detailed setting, there were plenty of options out there...)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The problems with this are two-fold:</p><p></p><p>1) The majority of gaming groups don't use <em>any</em> setting - they homebrew, or don't give any great thought to the setting at all.</p><p></p><p>2) Even those groups who do use a setting typically only use one, so multiple settings inherently compete with one another.</p><p></p><p>During 3e days, WotC dealt with this through three mechanisms: firstly, they concentrated all of their resources on a single* setting (Forgotten Realms); secondly, they priced setting books at a premium, so that they had to sell fewer copies to make them worthwhile to publish; and thirdly, they filled those setting books with a great deal of 'crunch', meaning that they were of significant use to people who <em>weren't</em> using the setting - the FRCS for example contains dozens of races, spells and magic items that can be used just as easily in a Greyhawk/Eberron/homebrew campaign.</p><p></p><p>* Of course, you're going to point out my mistake here - Eberron. However, Eberron was very definitely a special case. Firstly, it came late in the edition cycle, when the FR releases had distinctly slowed down. Secondly, and probably most importantly, Eberron had <em>massive</em> hype due to the "Setting Search" competition that WotC did. This more or less guaranteed that Eberron would be a hit, at least in those first few releases.</p><p></p><p>The upshot is that I would be <em>very</em> surprised if WotC provided significant support for any setting beyond FR (though there may well be a 'default' setting in the core books). Even the 3-book model from 4e looks unlikely to continue - after FR, Eberron and Dark Sun, they seem to have abandoned it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 5961896, member: 22424"] Actually, I was glad of this. One of the things I liked [i]most[/i] about PoL-land was that it was left undefined, and so open for the DM to do what he liked with it. I always felt that the more WotC fleshed out the Nentir Vale, the less utility that setting had. (And for those who [i]wanted[/i] a detailed setting, there were plenty of options out there...) The problems with this are two-fold: 1) The majority of gaming groups don't use [i]any[/i] setting - they homebrew, or don't give any great thought to the setting at all. 2) Even those groups who do use a setting typically only use one, so multiple settings inherently compete with one another. During 3e days, WotC dealt with this through three mechanisms: firstly, they concentrated all of their resources on a single* setting (Forgotten Realms); secondly, they priced setting books at a premium, so that they had to sell fewer copies to make them worthwhile to publish; and thirdly, they filled those setting books with a great deal of 'crunch', meaning that they were of significant use to people who [i]weren't[/i] using the setting - the FRCS for example contains dozens of races, spells and magic items that can be used just as easily in a Greyhawk/Eberron/homebrew campaign. * Of course, you're going to point out my mistake here - Eberron. However, Eberron was very definitely a special case. Firstly, it came late in the edition cycle, when the FR releases had distinctly slowed down. Secondly, and probably most importantly, Eberron had [i]massive[/i] hype due to the "Setting Search" competition that WotC did. This more or less guaranteed that Eberron would be a hit, at least in those first few releases. The upshot is that I would be [i]very[/i] surprised if WotC provided significant support for any setting beyond FR (though there may well be a 'default' setting in the core books). Even the 3-book model from 4e looks unlikely to continue - after FR, Eberron and Dark Sun, they seem to have abandoned it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Hope for Nerath? (On D&D Next Campaign Settings and a Plea to WotC)
Top