Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mecheon" data-source="post: 8959288" data-attributes="member: 6801776">Honestly I'd flat out remove stunning strike, or at least make it only to one sub-class. The problem is its that powerful of an ability its going to impact balance. So.... Remove it from 'em all. Give one the 'you do stunning strike spam' and buff up every other one for the loss of it.Without stunning strike, monks can get the stuff they need to make them more powerful in other aspects Oh, and no name changes. Monk's got enough inertia behind it as an RPG Thing in this day and age. Basically if its a class in Warcraft and Final Fantasy, you can be pretty sure people know what it is. I've seen some of them be absolute glass cannons in the right situation. Depends on what they're fighting, but they do have some good 'run in and deal damage' potential to 'em. Just, you better hope the hits absolutely connect (plus the party in question really didn't have any other big damage dealers)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mecheon, post: 8959288, member: 6801776"] Honestly I'd flat out remove stunning strike, or at least make it only to one sub-class. The problem is its that powerful of an ability its going to impact balance. So.... Remove it from 'em all. Give one the 'you do stunning strike spam' and buff up every other one for the loss of it. Without stunning strike, monks can get the stuff they need to make them more powerful in other aspects Oh, and no name changes. Monk's got enough inertia behind it as an RPG Thing in this day and age. Basically if its a class in Warcraft and Final Fantasy, you can be pretty sure people know what it is. I've seen some of them be absolute glass cannons in the right situation. Depends on what they're fighting, but they do have some good 'run in and deal damage' potential to 'em. Just, you better hope the hits absolutely connect (plus the party in question really didn't have any other big damage dealers) [/QUOTE]

Verification