Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(+) Hopes for The Monk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 8959486" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Sure. And when it comes to being a striker, the +1 to hit and +1 to damage for every attack all day every combat beats +ZERO to hit, +1d6 to damage against opponents in some combats, where you are also losing attacks every time you need to switch who it targets.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Come on, don't use hyperbole, discuss this fairly. You're in combat. You have a free bonus attack, and several bonus attack features. And enough movement to get up to an enemy. Monks have a very active bonus action economy.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, it was a typo. You compared to 1d10+mod, which is a 2H reach weapon, but you never mentioned reach. I was trying to correct to 2d6+mod (greatsword) or 1d8+mod AND +2 AC (1H weapon and shield). But I wrote 2d4 instead. My mistake.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The point is that when you have say 4 Ki for an entire day, pointing out that 1 Ki for Flurry of Blows gives you an extra 1d4+mod damage does not move you into Striker zone.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure how you mean this. We were talking about the bonus damage Flurry of Blows brings over your default bonus action attack. 1d4+mod damage on a hit 1-4 times per day is absolutely less damage than a like level barbarian who has +2 melee damage for 2-3 combats a day. It's not close, at low levels the barbarian's consumable special ability of rage adds far more damage than a monk's consumable special ability of Ki to power Flurry of Blows.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm confused by this statement. "The monk is not built as a striker, and here's the numbers that show it" is a true statement. Yes, that's based on the execution of the class. Which is more true than just trying to apply a label like striker to it.</p><p></p><p>Really, the execution of the class -- what it actually does -- defines what type of class it is. Which is nothing more than a label that describes it's execution <strong>Not only is it not irrelevant, it is the most relevant thing.</strong></p><p></p><p>Please, tell me about how a class actually plays is irrelevant to a descriptive label for how the class plays.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 8959486, member: 20564"] Sure. And when it comes to being a striker, the +1 to hit and +1 to damage for every attack all day every combat beats +ZERO to hit, +1d6 to damage against opponents in some combats, where you are also losing attacks every time you need to switch who it targets. Come on, don't use hyperbole, discuss this fairly. You're in combat. You have a free bonus attack, and several bonus attack features. And enough movement to get up to an enemy. Monks have a very active bonus action economy. Sorry, it was a typo. You compared to 1d10+mod, which is a 2H reach weapon, but you never mentioned reach. I was trying to correct to 2d6+mod (greatsword) or 1d8+mod AND +2 AC (1H weapon and shield). But I wrote 2d4 instead. My mistake. The point is that when you have say 4 Ki for an entire day, pointing out that 1 Ki for Flurry of Blows gives you an extra 1d4+mod damage does not move you into Striker zone. Not sure how you mean this. We were talking about the bonus damage Flurry of Blows brings over your default bonus action attack. 1d4+mod damage on a hit 1-4 times per day is absolutely less damage than a like level barbarian who has +2 melee damage for 2-3 combats a day. It's not close, at low levels the barbarian's consumable special ability of rage adds far more damage than a monk's consumable special ability of Ki to power Flurry of Blows. I'm confused by this statement. "The monk is not built as a striker, and here's the numbers that show it" is a true statement. Yes, that's based on the execution of the class. Which is more true than just trying to apply a label like striker to it. Really, the execution of the class -- what it actually does -- defines what type of class it is. Which is nothing more than a label that describes it's execution [B]Not only is it not irrelevant, it is the most relevant thing.[/B] Please, tell me about how a class actually plays is irrelevant to a descriptive label for how the class plays. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(+) Hopes for The Monk
Top