Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sidmandoo" data-source="post: 7562791" data-attributes="member: 6920931">This really sums it up the dilemma.&nbsp; It's not clear because Horde Breaker is never given an actual definition of what it is in its description.&nbsp; It isn't an action, bonus action, or reaction.&nbsp; It just 'is' in and of itself, so what to do with it?I promise you I am not a rules lawyer, this just came up at my table and I found this gap. I am probably going to go with not allowing the second attack with the heavy crossbow, mostly because it makes sense from a real world perspective.&nbsp; If it can't be done in a multiattack situation, it does not make sense for it to be allowed in this pseudo-reactionary-bonus actioney-whatever-it-is situation with Horde Breaker.&nbsp; (yes, I know, &quot;actioney&quot; is not a word).&nbsp; Appreciate the conversation from everyone.&nbsp; I pinged Jeremy Crawford on twitter to see if I could get a bite.&nbsp; Perhaps the master will chime in.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sidmandoo, post: 7562791, member: 6920931"] This really sums it up the dilemma. It's not clear because Horde Breaker is never given an actual definition of what it is in its description. It isn't an action, bonus action, or reaction. It just 'is' in and of itself, so what to do with it? I promise you I am not a rules lawyer, this just came up at my table and I found this gap. I am probably going to go with not allowing the second attack with the heavy crossbow, mostly because it makes sense from a real world perspective. If it can't be done in a multiattack situation, it does not make sense for it to be allowed in this pseudo-reactionary-bonus actioney-whatever-it-is situation with Horde Breaker. (yes, I know, "actioney" is not a word). Appreciate the conversation from everyone. I pinged Jeremy Crawford on twitter to see if I could get a bite. Perhaps the master will chime in. [/QUOTE]

Verification