Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Hordes of the Abyss.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 2853534" data-attributes="member: 11697"><p>If that's presented as fact rather than legend and theory, that's a pretty gigantic deviation from any of the prior origin myths of the Tanar'ri. The notion of the Tanar'ri being the byproducts of yugoloth purification at the direction of the Baernaloths (intentional or not) was pretty firmly established. Plus, the idea of deities being there before the Tanar'ri is just bizarre (and contradictory to the Blood War timeline in Hellbound).</p><p></p><p>Though if this new theory is presented as the Tanar'ri take on their own origins, I'm fine with that, it's racial propaganda, and an interesting take on things. Theories biased by self promotion are cool, and are more important when you're embroiled in something like the Blood War. But if it's intended to rewrite the material from Hellbound, Faces of Evil, etc, not so cool. I'll have to read the section myself to really say for sure.</p><p></p><p>Of course if FC:I and FC:II both have their own biased origin legends, tilted to favor their specific planes' inhabitants, that's cool. Tanar'ri histories tend to be nonexistant or nonsensical, and Baatezu histories tend to be political propaganda and historical revisionism taken to its furthest extremes. The 'loths have the oldest histories, and apparently the most comprehensive ones, but they don't like to share and what has leaked out they tend to not comment on, and when they do... hard to trust them at face value given what they are.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Does it address the Queen of Chaos as not being from the Abyss? (I generally hold the QoC and Miska as pure, unadulterated cheese, but hopefully the book can redeem them somewhat. I'll have to read it over though to see if I like the angle it takes with them or not).</p><p></p><p>The Obyriths and Loumaras I like. I tentatively like them a lot.</p><p></p><p>Among the abyssal lords, Pale Night is probably the one that snags my attention the most, and FC:I placing her explicitely as one of the Obyriths was a nice touch that links very well with her writeup in FoE. Kudos on that addition to the lore of the Abyss.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemeska, post: 2853534, member: 11697"] If that's presented as fact rather than legend and theory, that's a pretty gigantic deviation from any of the prior origin myths of the Tanar'ri. The notion of the Tanar'ri being the byproducts of yugoloth purification at the direction of the Baernaloths (intentional or not) was pretty firmly established. Plus, the idea of deities being there before the Tanar'ri is just bizarre (and contradictory to the Blood War timeline in Hellbound). Though if this new theory is presented as the Tanar'ri take on their own origins, I'm fine with that, it's racial propaganda, and an interesting take on things. Theories biased by self promotion are cool, and are more important when you're embroiled in something like the Blood War. But if it's intended to rewrite the material from Hellbound, Faces of Evil, etc, not so cool. I'll have to read the section myself to really say for sure. Of course if FC:I and FC:II both have their own biased origin legends, tilted to favor their specific planes' inhabitants, that's cool. Tanar'ri histories tend to be nonexistant or nonsensical, and Baatezu histories tend to be political propaganda and historical revisionism taken to its furthest extremes. The 'loths have the oldest histories, and apparently the most comprehensive ones, but they don't like to share and what has leaked out they tend to not comment on, and when they do... hard to trust them at face value given what they are. Does it address the Queen of Chaos as not being from the Abyss? (I generally hold the QoC and Miska as pure, unadulterated cheese, but hopefully the book can redeem them somewhat. I'll have to read it over though to see if I like the angle it takes with them or not). The Obyriths and Loumaras I like. I tentatively like them a lot. Among the abyssal lords, Pale Night is probably the one that snags my attention the most, and FC:I placing her explicitely as one of the Obyriths was a nice touch that links very well with her writeup in FoE. Kudos on that addition to the lore of the Abyss. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Hordes of the Abyss.
Top