Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 2865179" data-attributes="member: 326">Hello again Psion! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I was talking about one high-end (Manifestation), one low end (Aspect), and I stand by the worst case scenario one extra page per entry (assuming you are using core rulebook font sizes).I'd rather have 12 Demon Lords done properly than 15 half-baked.You don't have to grant me anything, I flat out state it as a fact, because thats the way I handle it in my book.The idea that they had to cut things so they would have the space to reprint/recycle material from other books just makes my brain boggle.  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid    :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /> A page restriction which, by itself makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Obviously you have page targets but are they honestly saying that the wheels would fall off WotC if this book had been 176 pages instead of 160!? I find that hard to believe.</blockquote>