Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 2866021" data-attributes="member: 172">Omitting Paizo, eh? I supposed you'd ask me if I wanted to split my tens in blackjack, too?I don't think that it's safe to ignore Demonomicon any more than it's safe to ingore the scaling. If you go on chopping out every reference or tool that will make the game in the image you want it, I really don't have any sympathy for you if you are left with a game you don't want. But lets be serious here. People who are serious planes/demon fans are not going to be chucking their dragons issues with the demonomicons in the trash. They are going to be on the top shelf. Your constructed stacked-deck wager has no real bearing on the issue at hand.What is "supports" supposed to mean in this context? Because from what I see, it "supports" any power level from the base around 20 to... as far as you want to extend it.Edit: But really. I am trying to express why I think this is a good thing, but it just keeps escalating. I think those who have ears have heard. I really don't want to make this personal, and from the tone of you last post, it sounds like it's headed that way.Perhaps we could just agree to disagree? I think you are missing out, but I can't make you like it.As for me, after the travesty that was DDG, I feel that the actual-play oriented nature of this book is a good thing.</blockquote>