Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
HotDQ looking like an early TPK...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kraydak" data-source="post: 6472554" data-attributes="member: 12306"><p>Yes, you are looking at a TPK. No, you don't have any good options. When you buy a stand-alone module, you can just get one at the appropriate power level for the party. When you buy a campaign, then the PCs need to be at the right level at the right time. Yes, you can rewrite the opposition… but that is (a) a lot of work which negates the value of buying a module and (b) just sets you up for trouble in the next episode. In some cases you can run a side-quest… but often the campaign has a time-line which makes taking breaks a total immersion breaker. Exactly the situation you are in. For most gaming groups, what you DON'T want to do is run the TPK. The PCs did nothing stupid or wrong, and sending them into the cave at level 1/2 is effectively a TPK-by-DM-fiat. In DND it is very hard to gauge the difficulty level of the opposition, and you really, really want players to be willing to take risks. In this scenario, there is no evidence that going into the caves at level 1/2 is suicide, and there is lots of evidence that that is what the module wants them to do. Running a bait-and-switch there (and that just after the infamous Cyanwrath encounter), is a terrible, terrible, terrible idea. TPK because the PCs did something stupid/risky is fine, and risking a TPK because the PCs did something stupid/risky is a good idea. This isn't that scenario.</p><p></p><p>I'd say level the PCs by fiat (which does break immersion, yes) and blame the writers, who did a frankly awful job. The first episode assumes that PCs will blindly charge into a town which is being aerially-patrolled by a guaranteed-TPK dragon. The second episode assumes that the PCs will blindly attempt to infiltrate an enemy camp, which sounds like a terrible, terrible idea unless you metagame-intuit that that was the right thing to do. Sure, the writers are allowed to assume a strong DM-nudge for episode 1 to get the ball rolling, but they needed to add a backup plan if the PCs didn't behave suicidally in episode 2, and they didn't, and your PCs didn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kraydak, post: 6472554, member: 12306"] Yes, you are looking at a TPK. No, you don't have any good options. When you buy a stand-alone module, you can just get one at the appropriate power level for the party. When you buy a campaign, then the PCs need to be at the right level at the right time. Yes, you can rewrite the opposition… but that is (a) a lot of work which negates the value of buying a module and (b) just sets you up for trouble in the next episode. In some cases you can run a side-quest… but often the campaign has a time-line which makes taking breaks a total immersion breaker. Exactly the situation you are in. For most gaming groups, what you DON'T want to do is run the TPK. The PCs did nothing stupid or wrong, and sending them into the cave at level 1/2 is effectively a TPK-by-DM-fiat. In DND it is very hard to gauge the difficulty level of the opposition, and you really, really want players to be willing to take risks. In this scenario, there is no evidence that going into the caves at level 1/2 is suicide, and there is lots of evidence that that is what the module wants them to do. Running a bait-and-switch there (and that just after the infamous Cyanwrath encounter), is a terrible, terrible, terrible idea. TPK because the PCs did something stupid/risky is fine, and risking a TPK because the PCs did something stupid/risky is a good idea. This isn't that scenario. I'd say level the PCs by fiat (which does break immersion, yes) and blame the writers, who did a frankly awful job. The first episode assumes that PCs will blindly charge into a town which is being aerially-patrolled by a guaranteed-TPK dragon. The second episode assumes that the PCs will blindly attempt to infiltrate an enemy camp, which sounds like a terrible, terrible idea unless you metagame-intuit that that was the right thing to do. Sure, the writers are allowed to assume a strong DM-nudge for episode 1 to get the ball rolling, but they needed to add a backup plan if the PCs didn't behave suicidally in episode 2, and they didn't, and your PCs didn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
HotDQ looking like an early TPK...
Top