Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
House Rule - level bonus added to damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 4570757" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>Good replies all around, thank you. The two main reasons I'm thinking about doing this are:</p><p></p><p>1) "Realism". I like the idea of higher level characters doing the same things more effectively than lower levels, and not just the miniscule difference in Ability score bonuses. Again, the question: Shouldn't a 20th level wizard's magic missile--unmodified by anything--be markedly more powerful than a 1st level wizard's?</p><p></p><p>2) Speeding up combat. I didn't mention this before, but I like the idea of speeding up combat a bit. We've only played two sessions, but I've found combat a tad on the long side...a couple times I used the old DM Fiat and speeded up an encounter by dropping monster HP (but this also had to do with several PCs being on the verge of death!).</p><p></p><p>Now I tend to like minimal house rules, because rules systems are kind of like pick-up sticks: You mess with one stick and you move three others. This can be especially glaring when players try to exploit rules through min-maxing or whatever. But I have always tweaked whatever rule system I've used, and I imagine that once I learn 4ed better I'll start tweaking it. But what I want to avoid is what would seemingly happen if I added this house rule: feats and such would be less desirable than simply ability score gain, and the "specialness" of encounter and daily powers would be less striking.</p><p></p><p>I could do +1 HP at every four levels, so +1 at 4th, +2 at 8th, +3 at 12th, +4 at 16th, +5 at 20th, +6 at 24th and +7 at 28th. But there is something awkward about that; any house rules I employ should have to be relatively "built in"--like simply saying that the half-level bonus to attacks also applies to damage, rather than the less aesthetically pleasing "quarter level bonus applies to damage."</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, look at Jedrious's example of the 30th level rogue. A piercing strike range of 16-22 HP for a 30th level character seems kind of weak; I mean, we're talking about a near-immortal here.</p><p></p><p>Another option would be to add in some kind of extra critical capacity...</p><p>H</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 4570757, member: 59082"] Good replies all around, thank you. The two main reasons I'm thinking about doing this are: 1) "Realism". I like the idea of higher level characters doing the same things more effectively than lower levels, and not just the miniscule difference in Ability score bonuses. Again, the question: Shouldn't a 20th level wizard's magic missile--unmodified by anything--be markedly more powerful than a 1st level wizard's? 2) Speeding up combat. I didn't mention this before, but I like the idea of speeding up combat a bit. We've only played two sessions, but I've found combat a tad on the long side...a couple times I used the old DM Fiat and speeded up an encounter by dropping monster HP (but this also had to do with several PCs being on the verge of death!). Now I tend to like minimal house rules, because rules systems are kind of like pick-up sticks: You mess with one stick and you move three others. This can be especially glaring when players try to exploit rules through min-maxing or whatever. But I have always tweaked whatever rule system I've used, and I imagine that once I learn 4ed better I'll start tweaking it. But what I want to avoid is what would seemingly happen if I added this house rule: feats and such would be less desirable than simply ability score gain, and the "specialness" of encounter and daily powers would be less striking. I could do +1 HP at every four levels, so +1 at 4th, +2 at 8th, +3 at 12th, +4 at 16th, +5 at 20th, +6 at 24th and +7 at 28th. But there is something awkward about that; any house rules I employ should have to be relatively "built in"--like simply saying that the half-level bonus to attacks also applies to damage, rather than the less aesthetically pleasing "quarter level bonus applies to damage." On the other hand, look at Jedrious's example of the 30th level rogue. A piercing strike range of 16-22 HP for a 30th level character seems kind of weak; I mean, we're talking about a near-immortal here. Another option would be to add in some kind of extra critical capacity... H [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
House Rule - level bonus added to damage?
Top