Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wakrob" data-source="post: 4682272" data-attributes="member: 74017">My DM has adopted the +1/2 lvl damage rule for about 2 months now.&nbsp; I play a rogue.&nbsp; I keep arguing that it hurts strikers because it narrows the % margin between my striker damage and the others.&nbsp; I have been asking for Strikers to get +lvl damage.I was hoping someone here might agree with me for some unbias support to my cause.My average damage with sneak attack combared our Halfling Fighter using a handaxe was 184%, now the new rule brings it down to 162%.&nbsp; A bigger fighter could easily have a bigger weapon than d6 but this Halfling also uses a odd feat from the Dragon gladiator article that lets him make a basic ranged attack after a Cleave (some fighting style) so that he actually averages more damage than me if they both hit.&nbsp;Anyone agree it would be more fair to give Strikers +lvl to other classes +1/2 lvl?&nbsp;ThanksWak</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wakrob, post: 4682272, member: 74017"] My DM has adopted the +1/2 lvl damage rule for about 2 months now. I play a rogue. I keep arguing that it hurts strikers because it narrows the % margin between my striker damage and the others. I have been asking for Strikers to get +lvl damage. I was hoping someone here might agree with me for some unbias support to my cause. My average damage with sneak attack combared our Halfling Fighter using a handaxe was 184%, now the new rule brings it down to 162%. A bigger fighter could easily have a bigger weapon than d6 but this Halfling also uses a odd feat from the Dragon gladiator article that lets him make a basic ranged attack after a Cleave (some fighting style) so that he actually averages more damage than me if they both hit. Anyone agree it would be more fair to give Strikers +lvl to other classes +1/2 lvl? Thanks Wak [/QUOTE]

Verification