Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
House Rule Patches to 4e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 5727604" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>This comes out of a discussion with one of my players about Bladesinger. He felt that it was a striker. He says the Char Op boards back him up on this one. I asked how. He said that the point of playing a Bladesinger was to get as many items that allowed you to get back Encounter powers as possible and use Bladesong every round of combat.</p><p></p><p>I thought there was no way to recover it, given it isn't an attack or utility power and is a class feature with no level...thereby not qualifying for almost every ability to recover an encounter power. WOTC has errataed a bunch of rules items to say "Attack power" or "Utility power" since they've discovered this issue(it applies to a couple other classes as well)....but hasn't errated them all. So, of course, players use the ones that aren't errated yet to get it back. Thus, my house rule just changes the rest of them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is that mathematically, any modifier higher than 5 is basically a guaranteed hit/miss/save/failed save. And if you can guarantee that, you can make an enemy incapable of saving against a stun or unable to hit. Combine this with abilities to recover powers or a psion and you can guarantee that it'll happen to the enemy every combat...possibly every round of every combat.</p><p></p><p>Maybe it is just worth saying "modifiers are capped to attacks and saves at -3 for at wills, -4 for encounters, -5 for dailies at all tiers. Modifiers to these rolls will not stack above -5, regardless of what source they come from."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 5727604, member: 5143"] This comes out of a discussion with one of my players about Bladesinger. He felt that it was a striker. He says the Char Op boards back him up on this one. I asked how. He said that the point of playing a Bladesinger was to get as many items that allowed you to get back Encounter powers as possible and use Bladesong every round of combat. I thought there was no way to recover it, given it isn't an attack or utility power and is a class feature with no level...thereby not qualifying for almost every ability to recover an encounter power. WOTC has errataed a bunch of rules items to say "Attack power" or "Utility power" since they've discovered this issue(it applies to a couple other classes as well)....but hasn't errated them all. So, of course, players use the ones that aren't errated yet to get it back. Thus, my house rule just changes the rest of them. The problem is that mathematically, any modifier higher than 5 is basically a guaranteed hit/miss/save/failed save. And if you can guarantee that, you can make an enemy incapable of saving against a stun or unable to hit. Combine this with abilities to recover powers or a psion and you can guarantee that it'll happen to the enemy every combat...possibly every round of every combat. Maybe it is just worth saying "modifiers are capped to attacks and saves at -3 for at wills, -4 for encounters, -5 for dailies at all tiers. Modifiers to these rolls will not stack above -5, regardless of what source they come from." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
House Rule Patches to 4e
Top