Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8145638" data-attributes="member: 93670">They generally don't get much of anything out of short rests &amp; in some cases/situations they literally get nothing out of them.&nbsp; The frequency a warlock would like to take a short rest (basically after every fight) would almost immediately run into the point where long rest casters gain nothing.&nbsp; That &quot;you might not be able to always use leveled slots&quot; factor is why the warlock dies 1d10+cha+knockback*2/3/4 force damage at 5 11 &amp; 17 with eldritch blast rather than a frequently resisted/immune energy type once per cast so forcing the long rest classes to meet warlock under the best possible conditions by nerfing them is massively buffing warlocks while allowing them to keep their powerful toy intended to bridge the gap as is.&nbsp; It doesn't seem like the long rest casters are getting much compared to their losses or the benefits short rest classes are getting... I suspect your rule will frustrate and annoy long rest classes into asking to change classes or just finding another group.Unfortunately wotc presented a completely forseeable situation that basically requires massive game system rewriting to meaningfully alter the rest structure in 5e &amp; you have no particularly good solutions</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 8145638, member: 93670"] They generally don't get much of anything out of short rests & in some cases/situations they literally get [I]nothing[/I] out of them. The frequency a warlock would like to take a short rest (basically after every fight) would almost immediately run into the point where long rest casters gain nothing. That "you might not be able to always use leveled slots" factor is why the warlock dies 1d10+cha+knockback*2/3/4 force damage at 5 11 & 17 with eldritch blast rather than a frequently resisted/immune energy type once per cast so forcing the long rest classes to meet warlock under the best possible conditions by nerfing them is massively buffing warlocks while allowing them to keep their powerful toy intended to bridge the gap as is. It doesn't seem like the long rest casters are getting much compared to their losses or the benefits short rest classes are getting... I suspect your rule will frustrate and annoy long rest classes into asking to change classes or just finding another group. Unfortunately wotc presented a completely forseeable situation that basically requires massive game system rewriting to meaningfully alter the rest structure in 5e & you have no particularly good solutions [/QUOTE]

Verification