Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
House Rules: Rolling Ability Scores
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cernor" data-source="post: 6381295" data-attributes="member: 6780066"><p>Alright, so today I spent my whole day figuring out the potential results of generating ability scores based on rolling rather than choosing the standard array (findings below).</p><p></p><p>Feel free to share the file, but I'd ask that if you do, make sure that you give credit where it's due. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I manipulated the data a bit, and it turns out that the (weighted) average ability score is 12.24; comparing this to the mean of the standard array which is 12, it means that rolled characters will on average be slightly better than characters using standard array, but not enough to utterly break the game (unless someone gets REALLY lucky and rolls everything higher than 15 or so).</p><p>However, having the data available to me made me think of a few house rules based on rolling ability scores to make it a more viable option for players who like having that extra degree of customization, without risking breaking the game too much. As I'm relatively inexperienced at both DMing and homebrewing, I'd like feedback as to what I can do to refine these rules and make it balanced.</p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>Module The First: Freedom of Choice</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span><span style="font-size: 12px">After rolling a set of 6 ability scores, the player may choose between the rolled values or the standard array. If (s)he likes neither set of ability scores, (s)he may roll up to three more sets of ability scores. However, the player must then choose one of the newly rolled sets rather than the standard array or initially rolled scores.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px">For example, Adam decides he wants to roll for his ability scores rather than using the standard array. The six scores he receives (standard 4d6 and drop the lowest) are 16, 14, 13, 12, 10, and 10. He may start the game with those scores, or he may choose to reroll. Because there are only minor differences between those and the standard array, he chooses to take a chance and reroll. The sets of scores he rolls are 16/13/12/11/9/9, 13/13/12/12/10 and 18/17/11/10/7/4. For his character's ability scores, he may choose between either the set of 16/15/12/11/9/9, the set of 13/13/12/12/10, or the set of 18/17/11/10/7/4, even if he dislikes them all.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p>My reasoning behind this is that if the player gets an above-average set of scores, then (s)he can take the scores as rolled and start the game with a slight boost to ability scores. However, if (s)he thinks that the rolled scores are not better than the standard array by enough of a margin, then (s)he can take a gamble to try and improve them even more. This may or may not pay off, and by removing the option of using the standard array if all the rolled scores are worse then it should ideally make the choice to reroll scores a more difficult one to make.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>Module the Second: Harnessing Chance</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong></strong></span><span style="font-size: 12px">After rolling the four dice to determine an ability score, the player may keep the 'dropped' dice and use it as part of the next ability score's calculation.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px">This one is a bit vague, and is easier to understand from the example. Example: Aria is going to create a Human Wizard and base it on herself. When she rolls for her first ability score, she somehow rolls a 4 and three sixes! She may now keep the 4 and use it for her next roll. If she does, she now only rolls 3d6 to calculate her ability scores. This time, she rolls a 3, 3, and 6. Because she carried over the 4, she can drop the 1 and use the 3, 4, and 6 to give a score of 13. She decides to keep the 3, and on her next roll rolls a 4, 5 and 6. Because she carried over her 3, she uses the 3, 5, and 6 to determine that score and drops the 4, making her score 14 rather than 15.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px">My reasoning behind this is that if you get exceptionally lucky and roll 4 good numbers, the current rules seem like the 4th good number is, for lack of a better word, wasted. When relying on good luck to create a character with a bit more customization than one built with the standard array, I believe that strokes of good luck should be able to be used strategically to help build the character the way the player wants.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 10px">Alright, that's it from me. Feel free to ask questions and suggest modifications, these are just ideas I had and I'm certain they have room for improvement!</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cernor, post: 6381295, member: 6780066"] Alright, so today I spent my whole day figuring out the potential results of generating ability scores based on rolling rather than choosing the standard array (findings below). Feel free to share the file, but I'd ask that if you do, make sure that you give credit where it's due. :) I manipulated the data a bit, and it turns out that the (weighted) average ability score is 12.24; comparing this to the mean of the standard array which is 12, it means that rolled characters will on average be slightly better than characters using standard array, but not enough to utterly break the game (unless someone gets REALLY lucky and rolls everything higher than 15 or so). However, having the data available to me made me think of a few house rules based on rolling ability scores to make it a more viable option for players who like having that extra degree of customization, without risking breaking the game too much. As I'm relatively inexperienced at both DMing and homebrewing, I'd like feedback as to what I can do to refine these rules and make it balanced. [SIZE=4] [B]Module The First: Freedom of Choice[/B] [/SIZE][SIZE=3]After rolling a set of 6 ability scores, the player may choose between the rolled values or the standard array. If (s)he likes neither set of ability scores, (s)he may roll up to three more sets of ability scores. However, the player must then choose one of the newly rolled sets rather than the standard array or initially rolled scores. [SIZE=2] For example, Adam decides he wants to roll for his ability scores rather than using the standard array. The six scores he receives (standard 4d6 and drop the lowest) are 16, 14, 13, 12, 10, and 10. He may start the game with those scores, or he may choose to reroll. Because there are only minor differences between those and the standard array, he chooses to take a chance and reroll. The sets of scores he rolls are 16/13/12/11/9/9, 13/13/12/12/10 and 18/17/11/10/7/4. For his character's ability scores, he may choose between either the set of 16/15/12/11/9/9, the set of 13/13/12/12/10, or the set of 18/17/11/10/7/4, even if he dislikes them all. [/SIZE][/SIZE] My reasoning behind this is that if the player gets an above-average set of scores, then (s)he can take the scores as rolled and start the game with a slight boost to ability scores. However, if (s)he thinks that the rolled scores are not better than the standard array by enough of a margin, then (s)he can take a gamble to try and improve them even more. This may or may not pay off, and by removing the option of using the standard array if all the rolled scores are worse then it should ideally make the choice to reroll scores a more difficult one to make. [SIZE=4][B]Module the Second: Harnessing Chance [/B][/SIZE][SIZE=3]After rolling the four dice to determine an ability score, the player may keep the 'dropped' dice and use it as part of the next ability score's calculation. [SIZE=2]This one is a bit vague, and is easier to understand from the example. Example: Aria is going to create a Human Wizard and base it on herself. When she rolls for her first ability score, she somehow rolls a 4 and three sixes! She may now keep the 4 and use it for her next roll. If she does, she now only rolls 3d6 to calculate her ability scores. This time, she rolls a 3, 3, and 6. Because she carried over the 4, she can drop the 1 and use the 3, 4, and 6 to give a score of 13. She decides to keep the 3, and on her next roll rolls a 4, 5 and 6. Because she carried over her 3, she uses the 3, 5, and 6 to determine that score and drops the 4, making her score 14 rather than 15. [/SIZE][SIZE=2] My reasoning behind this is that if you get exceptionally lucky and roll 4 good numbers, the current rules seem like the 4th good number is, for lack of a better word, wasted. When relying on good luck to create a character with a bit more customization than one built with the standard array, I believe that strokes of good luck should be able to be used strategically to help build the character the way the player wants. Alright, that's it from me. Feel free to ask questions and suggest modifications, these are just ideas I had and I'm certain they have room for improvement![/SIZE][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
House Rules: Rolling Ability Scores
Top