Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
House Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Immolate" data-source="post: 4226861" data-attributes="member: 62381"><p>4E has been (probably) the most extensively pre-viewed new edition of Dungeons and Dragons in its 30-year history. We've all seen a thing or two that we object to. With the qualifier that we've yet to see the entire rule-set, and understanding that everyone retains the right to change their mind or "try it out", <strong>what house rules do you already forsee using in your campaigns</strong>?</p><p></p><p>My group has always taken a hard line on death. We want it to be meaningful in a significant way. An entire sub-system of house rules has grown around that concept. </p><p></p><p>First, rule zero of death in our games is that death is final. There is no coming back.</p><p></p><p>Second, because death is final, we allow characters to to negative ten-plus-con-bonus before they are dead.</p><p></p><p>Third, for the same reason, we spend a mandated five minutes after a character dies, reconsidering all of the events that led to that death and making sure that no bonuses were forgotten, no debuffs missed on the bad guys, etc.</p><p></p><p>Finally, we allow new characters to start at half the average xp total of the group, at the player's discretion.</p><p></p><p>So how does that translate over into 4E? At the Epic levels, epic destinies codify the temporary nature of death to the point that you can't simply tweak them to remove the undesired effect. It makes the use of epic destinies, as they stand, impossible for us to incorporate. </p><p></p><p>But I like the idea of a third-tier specialization track, so we'll put some time and effort into creating a number of epic destinies that are consistent with a theme, but avoid incorporating immortality into the template (at least until the destiny is complete).</p><p></p><p>We've long used enduring campaign worlds where the old characters live on as legends and real-world actors who influence future campaigns. I think that is a good devise that adds depth and color to the world. I believe that most players will choose a destiny that leaves their character "in the world" for that reason. We think of it as retirement, and in retirement, characters naturally go off to pursue their individual passions, be it creating a school or becoming a farmer or getting into politics. They aren't a group anymore, so their influence doesn't become overwhelming. The DM has the choice of deciding how successful the former characters become, and they are his characters at that point, to do with as he wishes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Immolate, post: 4226861, member: 62381"] 4E has been (probably) the most extensively pre-viewed new edition of Dungeons and Dragons in its 30-year history. We've all seen a thing or two that we object to. With the qualifier that we've yet to see the entire rule-set, and understanding that everyone retains the right to change their mind or "try it out", [B]what house rules do you already forsee using in your campaigns[/B]? My group has always taken a hard line on death. We want it to be meaningful in a significant way. An entire sub-system of house rules has grown around that concept. First, rule zero of death in our games is that death is final. There is no coming back. Second, because death is final, we allow characters to to negative ten-plus-con-bonus before they are dead. Third, for the same reason, we spend a mandated five minutes after a character dies, reconsidering all of the events that led to that death and making sure that no bonuses were forgotten, no debuffs missed on the bad guys, etc. Finally, we allow new characters to start at half the average xp total of the group, at the player's discretion. So how does that translate over into 4E? At the Epic levels, epic destinies codify the temporary nature of death to the point that you can't simply tweak them to remove the undesired effect. It makes the use of epic destinies, as they stand, impossible for us to incorporate. But I like the idea of a third-tier specialization track, so we'll put some time and effort into creating a number of epic destinies that are consistent with a theme, but avoid incorporating immortality into the template (at least until the destiny is complete). We've long used enduring campaign worlds where the old characters live on as legends and real-world actors who influence future campaigns. I think that is a good devise that adds depth and color to the world. I believe that most players will choose a destiny that leaves their character "in the world" for that reason. We think of it as retirement, and in retirement, characters naturally go off to pursue their individual passions, be it creating a school or becoming a farmer or getting into politics. They aren't a group anymore, so their influence doesn't become overwhelming. The DM has the choice of deciding how successful the former characters become, and they are his characters at that point, to do with as he wishes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
House Rules
Top