Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
House Ruling 4E? How common
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rechan" data-source="post: 4915639" data-attributes="member: 54846"><p>Here's the house rules I want to try in my next campaign:</p><p>[sblock] <strong>Change to To-Hit formula</strong></p><p> </p><p> Normally you determine your attack bonus this way:</p><p> Primary Ability Score + ½ level + Weapon Proficiency + Enhancement + Feat </p><p> </p><p> I propose the following change:</p><p> 5 + ½ Level + Weapon Proficiency + Enhancement + Non-Expertise Feat</p><p> +1 at levels 5, 11, 15, 21, 25.</p><p> </p><p> Damage for an attack still depends on the primary score of the power used (such as 1[W]+Dex for a ranged basic attack). </p><p> </p><p> <strong>Power Stunts</strong></p><p> </p><p> Some times you want to do something very cool, that fits in line with your character’s theme, but there isn’t a rule for it. Such as a druid causing roots to spring out of the side of a cliff, aiding in climbing, or a Priest of Moradin causing a cave in to halt the retreat of enemies. </p><p> </p><p>To do this, you must spend an Action Point + a Healing Surge. This gives you the opportunity to do something badass. You still have to roll an attack or skill check (whichever better represents it). A normal Power Stunt is on par with the power of an Encounter power. You may also modify an Encounter power – making it effect more targets, etc. A modified Encounter power can be no more powerful than a Daily. A Daily can be modified, but it must be within reason (and my have drawbacks). What’s kosher is up to DM.</p><p> </p><p> <strong>Exploding Skills</strong></p><p> </p><p> Normally, a skill roll looks like this:</p><p> </p><p> 1d20 + Trained (which means +5) + ½ level + Ability Score + Race + Feat + Misc.</p><p> </p><p> Instead, here is what I’d like to try.</p><p> Untrained Skill: 3d6 + Ability Score + ½ level + Race + Feat + Misc</p><p> Trained Skill: 4d6 + Ability Score + ½ level + Race + Feat + Misc</p><p> Skill Focus feat grants +1d6 to roll. </p><p> </p><p> If you roll a 6, you add the result and re-roll the die. If you roll another 6, you add it in and re-roll again, until you no longer get a 6. </p><p> </p><p> <strong>Misc</strong></p><p> </p><p> Milestones (Which are necessary to gain Action Points) are not related to every two fights, but occur when something significant is achieved. Such as stopping an enemy’s ritual mid battle, or removing unhallowed ground, etc. Other opportunities for gaining Action Points will occur.</p><p> </p><p> At level 1, everyone receives a free racial feat. </p><p> </p><p> Against Solo Monsters, Stun = Loss of a Standard Action, Daze = Loss of a minor. </p><p> </p><p> Sure Strike/Careful Attack – Add following. Effect: You gain a +2 on the next attack you make. </p><p> </p><p> Crafting will be handled with a skill challenge.[/sblock]</p><p>The consequence of these rules, I'm thinking, is that I would treat the PCs as one level higher than they are, in terms of determing XP budges (so an average encounter for a 1st level group is a 2nd level encounter). But I'm not sure about that, because their HP and attacks may not equate. On the other hand, I want to try and kill them. </p><p></p><p>I will say that treating Sure Strike/Careful Attack as an attack vs. ref that can be used as a Basic attack is a very tempting change. But I like my version for the simple fact that it provides a built-in strategy of using the AW before you use an Encounter/Daily.</p><p></p><p>Another tempting thought is treating an Encounter power that misses as having a recharge of 6. But that may be too much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rechan, post: 4915639, member: 54846"] Here's the house rules I want to try in my next campaign: [sblock] [B]Change to To-Hit formula[/B] Normally you determine your attack bonus this way: Primary Ability Score + ½ level + Weapon Proficiency + Enhancement + Feat I propose the following change: 5 + ½ Level + Weapon Proficiency + Enhancement + Non-Expertise Feat +1 at levels 5, 11, 15, 21, 25. Damage for an attack still depends on the primary score of the power used (such as 1[W]+Dex for a ranged basic attack). [B]Power Stunts[/B] Some times you want to do something very cool, that fits in line with your character’s theme, but there isn’t a rule for it. Such as a druid causing roots to spring out of the side of a cliff, aiding in climbing, or a Priest of Moradin causing a cave in to halt the retreat of enemies. To do this, you must spend an Action Point + a Healing Surge. This gives you the opportunity to do something badass. You still have to roll an attack or skill check (whichever better represents it). A normal Power Stunt is on par with the power of an Encounter power. You may also modify an Encounter power – making it effect more targets, etc. A modified Encounter power can be no more powerful than a Daily. A Daily can be modified, but it must be within reason (and my have drawbacks). What’s kosher is up to DM. [B]Exploding Skills[/B] Normally, a skill roll looks like this: 1d20 + Trained (which means +5) + ½ level + Ability Score + Race + Feat + Misc. Instead, here is what I’d like to try. Untrained Skill: 3d6 + Ability Score + ½ level + Race + Feat + Misc Trained Skill: 4d6 + Ability Score + ½ level + Race + Feat + Misc Skill Focus feat grants +1d6 to roll. If you roll a 6, you add the result and re-roll the die. If you roll another 6, you add it in and re-roll again, until you no longer get a 6. [B]Misc[/B] Milestones (Which are necessary to gain Action Points) are not related to every two fights, but occur when something significant is achieved. Such as stopping an enemy’s ritual mid battle, or removing unhallowed ground, etc. Other opportunities for gaining Action Points will occur. At level 1, everyone receives a free racial feat. Against Solo Monsters, Stun = Loss of a Standard Action, Daze = Loss of a minor. Sure Strike/Careful Attack – Add following. Effect: You gain a +2 on the next attack you make. Crafting will be handled with a skill challenge.[/sblock] The consequence of these rules, I'm thinking, is that I would treat the PCs as one level higher than they are, in terms of determing XP budges (so an average encounter for a 1st level group is a 2nd level encounter). But I'm not sure about that, because their HP and attacks may not equate. On the other hand, I want to try and kill them. I will say that treating Sure Strike/Careful Attack as an attack vs. ref that can be used as a Basic attack is a very tempting change. But I like my version for the simple fact that it provides a built-in strategy of using the AW before you use an Encounter/Daily. Another tempting thought is treating an Encounter power that misses as having a recharge of 6. But that may be too much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
House Ruling 4E? How common
Top