Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Houserule: Non Adventuring Skills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4019001" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>One of the things I liked about 3e was that you could give your character skills in Profession: Undertaker (or whatever) and have it actually reflected in the character's statistics, along with an actual mechanism for using the profession.</p><p></p><p>One of the things I hated about 3e was that if you wanted to give your character skills in Profession: Trial Lawyer, you had to give up skill points in Hide, Spot, or Open Locks. You know, the skills you were going to actually use as an adventurer, and which counted as part of your character's potency in the campaign.</p><p></p><p>Using 4e lingo, it seemed like poor siloing to me. I wanted to be able to give my characters ranks in weird professions or crafts, but I didn't want to do so if that choice made my character more likely to be eaten by a grue.</p><p></p><p>4e seems to be offering this solution: Just have ranks in adventurer-type skills, and negotiate with your DM to get him to permit you to have roleplay-related abilities like "expert preschool teacher." That satisfies the second point I made about 3e, namely, you no longer lose out on the ability to ride a horse because you chose to be good at taste testing chili contests.</p><p></p><p>But it doesn't satisfy the first part- there's no longer a mechanical reflection of this ability in your stats.</p><p></p><p>So, given that we know a good deal about how skills work, what about this houserule for the games I DM?</p><p></p><p>Create a number of non adventurer skills equal to the amount of skills you can convince me make sense before I start getting annoyed. You count as having ranks in these skills equal to your level divided by two, plus a logical ability modifier. If you can come up with a cool way to actually use these skills in the campaign, you will earn a +5 in these skills as if you were trained.</p><p></p><p>You count as having zero ranks in non adventurer skills that you do not select upon character creation, but if you find a way to obtain practice or training in their use during the campaign, you may gain the benefit of the use of this skill as listed above for skills chosen at character creation. Upgrading such a skill to a "trained" skill requires additional accomplishments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4019001, member: 40961"] One of the things I liked about 3e was that you could give your character skills in Profession: Undertaker (or whatever) and have it actually reflected in the character's statistics, along with an actual mechanism for using the profession. One of the things I hated about 3e was that if you wanted to give your character skills in Profession: Trial Lawyer, you had to give up skill points in Hide, Spot, or Open Locks. You know, the skills you were going to actually use as an adventurer, and which counted as part of your character's potency in the campaign. Using 4e lingo, it seemed like poor siloing to me. I wanted to be able to give my characters ranks in weird professions or crafts, but I didn't want to do so if that choice made my character more likely to be eaten by a grue. 4e seems to be offering this solution: Just have ranks in adventurer-type skills, and negotiate with your DM to get him to permit you to have roleplay-related abilities like "expert preschool teacher." That satisfies the second point I made about 3e, namely, you no longer lose out on the ability to ride a horse because you chose to be good at taste testing chili contests. But it doesn't satisfy the first part- there's no longer a mechanical reflection of this ability in your stats. So, given that we know a good deal about how skills work, what about this houserule for the games I DM? Create a number of non adventurer skills equal to the amount of skills you can convince me make sense before I start getting annoyed. You count as having ranks in these skills equal to your level divided by two, plus a logical ability modifier. If you can come up with a cool way to actually use these skills in the campaign, you will earn a +5 in these skills as if you were trained. You count as having zero ranks in non adventurer skills that you do not select upon character creation, but if you find a way to obtain practice or training in their use during the campaign, you may gain the benefit of the use of this skill as listed above for skills chosen at character creation. Upgrading such a skill to a "trained" skill requires additional accomplishments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Houserule: Non Adventuring Skills
Top