Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
how advanced is too advanced? [LONG]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="redwing" data-source="post: 3297125" data-attributes="member: 1430"><p>My game world is rapidly moving through its version of the industrial revolution. History on this world has so far closely followed that of ours: from medieval to renasisance. However here is were the divergance starts. </p><p></p><p>Magic has been discovered. Not only has it been discovered, it has been kept in the hands of those who want to maintain power over society. Magic has not developed like a normal fantasy D&D world. Most spells are related/useful to society. There are a few spells designated for war. As far as the spells affecting society goes, think Eberron taken a couple steps further. Social revolutions have occured pertaining to the fields of agriculture, politics, entertainment, industry, travel, communications, etc. The world is based more on the society and the people living in it than a group of adventures questing to kill all evil.</p><p></p><p>Jump 50 years into the future. Magic has seeped into several parts of society but hasn't become so common that vending machines sell scrolls and is not as powerful as grand wizards casting fireballs from towers. (Think low power and rare) Now comes the discovery of technology. Steam power has been discovered along with gunpowder. This technology is discovered by the commoners and therefore held by the people.</p><p></p><p>Jump 30-50 years later. Magic and Technology have grown together, albeit competitively at times and aiding one another at other times. Social revolutions are still occuring and the world is on the edge of what is believed to be a golden age (so they believe).</p><p></p><p>Now we have high powered/common magic and high powered (steam, etc.)/common technology trying to find its place in this changing world.</p><p></p><p>The world would have a somewhat steampunkish/victorian (Wells/Verne/Twain) leaning toward tolkien/howard/leiber fantasy. </p><p></p><p>Technology and Magic in theory are practically the same thing. There are three components to this theory: source, means, ends.</p><p></p><p>The source is where the power comes from either: technology or magic. The means is either: the machine (gears, springs, wheels, belts, axles, etc.) or the components, somatics, verbal encantations. The ends is the exact same thing for either. There are two ways to produce fire: a create fire spell or a flamethrower. </p><p></p><p>My question to you is: How far is too far? Seeing as how the effects are the same and the concept of the world/game is this struggle, each side needs to be equal. So where do I stop? I'm wanting it to be a victorian feeling. As I have mentioned the socialogical implications of both magic/technology are highly considered. Teleport, raise dead, messaging spells would shatter the normal notions of a fantasy world. Using technology as an example, where should I stop so I don't alter society so far from the victorian standard? (each technology will have a magical coutnerpart) The following lists of inventions were all actually created before 1875 (except for radio in 1912), so technically they fall into the 19th century. But do they have the victorian (yet still fantasy) feeling?</p><p></p><p>Communication: typewriter, printing press, telegraph, telephone, radio</p><p></p><p>entertainment: photography, motion pictures, phonograph</p><p></p><p>lighting: candlelight, oil, gaslamp</p><p></p><p>I have already chosen the level of advancements in other fields such as travel, health, agricultural, industrial, domestic, military, etc.</p><p></p><p>NOTE: I still want this to be somewhat fantasy (swords, armor, etc.) so I have only advanced guns to the flintlock stage. ALSO I know some of these (radio, telephone) should be obviously NO and others like the entire listing for entertainment should probably be NO as well, however, if there are spells in D&D that mimic these inventions, why shouldn't there be technology to do the same thing magic can do? Should I just limit the communication/illusion spells? Again I will state: my campaign style (and players preference) is not that of a normal D&D campaign. There is more political intrigue and how the world and its many societies change over time. We don't have a high suspension of disbelief and if there is magic there must be a realistic resopnse from the world, right down to the commoners (not just spell slinging adventurers). So the level to magic/technology will play a heavy role in the tone of the world and how society reacts and the philsophical, moral, and ethical issues that stem from them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="redwing, post: 3297125, member: 1430"] My game world is rapidly moving through its version of the industrial revolution. History on this world has so far closely followed that of ours: from medieval to renasisance. However here is were the divergance starts. Magic has been discovered. Not only has it been discovered, it has been kept in the hands of those who want to maintain power over society. Magic has not developed like a normal fantasy D&D world. Most spells are related/useful to society. There are a few spells designated for war. As far as the spells affecting society goes, think Eberron taken a couple steps further. Social revolutions have occured pertaining to the fields of agriculture, politics, entertainment, industry, travel, communications, etc. The world is based more on the society and the people living in it than a group of adventures questing to kill all evil. Jump 50 years into the future. Magic has seeped into several parts of society but hasn't become so common that vending machines sell scrolls and is not as powerful as grand wizards casting fireballs from towers. (Think low power and rare) Now comes the discovery of technology. Steam power has been discovered along with gunpowder. This technology is discovered by the commoners and therefore held by the people. Jump 30-50 years later. Magic and Technology have grown together, albeit competitively at times and aiding one another at other times. Social revolutions are still occuring and the world is on the edge of what is believed to be a golden age (so they believe). Now we have high powered/common magic and high powered (steam, etc.)/common technology trying to find its place in this changing world. The world would have a somewhat steampunkish/victorian (Wells/Verne/Twain) leaning toward tolkien/howard/leiber fantasy. Technology and Magic in theory are practically the same thing. There are three components to this theory: source, means, ends. The source is where the power comes from either: technology or magic. The means is either: the machine (gears, springs, wheels, belts, axles, etc.) or the components, somatics, verbal encantations. The ends is the exact same thing for either. There are two ways to produce fire: a create fire spell or a flamethrower. My question to you is: How far is too far? Seeing as how the effects are the same and the concept of the world/game is this struggle, each side needs to be equal. So where do I stop? I'm wanting it to be a victorian feeling. As I have mentioned the socialogical implications of both magic/technology are highly considered. Teleport, raise dead, messaging spells would shatter the normal notions of a fantasy world. Using technology as an example, where should I stop so I don't alter society so far from the victorian standard? (each technology will have a magical coutnerpart) The following lists of inventions were all actually created before 1875 (except for radio in 1912), so technically they fall into the 19th century. But do they have the victorian (yet still fantasy) feeling? Communication: typewriter, printing press, telegraph, telephone, radio entertainment: photography, motion pictures, phonograph lighting: candlelight, oil, gaslamp I have already chosen the level of advancements in other fields such as travel, health, agricultural, industrial, domestic, military, etc. NOTE: I still want this to be somewhat fantasy (swords, armor, etc.) so I have only advanced guns to the flintlock stage. ALSO I know some of these (radio, telephone) should be obviously NO and others like the entire listing for entertainment should probably be NO as well, however, if there are spells in D&D that mimic these inventions, why shouldn't there be technology to do the same thing magic can do? Should I just limit the communication/illusion spells? Again I will state: my campaign style (and players preference) is not that of a normal D&D campaign. There is more political intrigue and how the world and its many societies change over time. We don't have a high suspension of disbelief and if there is magic there must be a realistic resopnse from the world, right down to the commoners (not just spell slinging adventurers). So the level to magic/technology will play a heavy role in the tone of the world and how society reacts and the philsophical, moral, and ethical issues that stem from them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
how advanced is too advanced? [LONG]
Top