Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Black Knight Irios" data-source="post: 5212427" data-attributes="member: 8853">One thing is for sure if you have higher overall ability scores you can qualify for more feats more easily. The again, there are really awesome builds within the rules already and even with more feats to choose from you can't have more feats. The number of feat slots stays the same. For me there is no big difference in wether the at-will dpr is 93 or 98 in the epic tier based on a feat that is only available due to rolled ability scores.There are already Chaladin Polearm Control builds and they are good even though they are MAD. There is of course one type of feat that would be easier to obtain and that would be the various 19-20 crit expanding feats in epic tier.To get back on topic, if you as a DM conclude that the encounters as suggested in the DMG are too easy, make them harder. But wether or not this has anything to do with above average ability scores is debateable at least beginning with mid-paragon levels.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Black Knight Irios, post: 5212427, member: 8853"] One thing is for sure if you have higher overall ability scores you can qualify for more feats more easily. The again, there are really awesome builds within the rules already and even with more feats to choose from you can't have more feats. The number of feat slots stays the same. For me there is no big difference in wether the at-will dpr is 93 or 98 in the epic tier based on a feat that is only available due to rolled ability scores. There are already Chaladin Polearm Control builds and they are good even though they are MAD. There is of course one type of feat that would be easier to obtain and that would be the various 19-20 crit expanding feats in epic tier. To get back on topic, if you as a DM conclude that the encounters as suggested in the DMG are too easy, make them harder. But wether or not this has anything to do with above average ability scores is debateable at least beginning with mid-paragon levels. [/QUOTE]

Verification