Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Moon-Lancer" data-source="post: 3460692" data-attributes="member: 35798">that a bastard sword. A fullbade is a twohanded weapon for a medium creature. You also change the flavor entirely.However i see this as changing the intent of the fullbade itself. bastard swords were in 3.0, so whats the need for a fullbade? Why did it not say that instead of wielding a bastard sword in one hand it lets you wield a large bastard sword in two? I dont think your 3.5 conversion works well as their is already monkygrip. Monkygrip is extremely sub par but not only that, monkygrip at least lets you apply it to all weapons while exotic weapon fullblade does not. This is why I do not think your conversion works well. the fullblade without penalty does not break the game, and is balanced with power attack. how about this conversionits a two handed exotic weapon 2d8 19-20x2. its med and a tad on the heavy side. I dont see how you could say adding a -2 penalty were one did not exist before is a clean conversion. It has the same mechanics as before and it interacts with the rules in the same way that it would have in 3.0.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Moon-Lancer, post: 3460692, member: 35798"] that a bastard sword. A fullbade is a twohanded weapon for a medium creature. You also change the flavor entirely. However i see this as changing the intent of the fullbade itself. bastard swords were in 3.0, so whats the need for a fullbade? Why did it not say that instead of wielding a bastard sword in one hand it lets you wield a large bastard sword in two? I dont think your 3.5 conversion works well as their is already monkygrip. Monkygrip is extremely sub par but not only that, monkygrip at least lets you apply it to all weapons while exotic weapon fullblade does not. This is why I do not think your conversion works well. the fullblade without penalty does not break the game, and is balanced with power attack. how about this conversion its a two handed exotic weapon 2d8 19-20x2. its med and a tad on the heavy side. I dont see how you could say adding a -2 penalty were one did not exist before is a clean conversion. It has the same mechanics as before and it interacts with the rules in the same way that it would have in 3.0. [/QUOTE]

Verification