Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Woas" data-source="post: 2647011" data-attributes="member: 16317">I didn't really mean new game mechanics really when I wrote that. In my mind, I was thinking like new rules for spells or feats... which really is just my terse way of saying &quot;spell and feat discriptions, &amp;c.&quot; It would be pretty crazy if a module had like, the Expanded Psionics Handbook or rules similar to Magic of Incarnum randomly in the back of it or something of the sort <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Exactly. Whenever I scan threads about Prestige Classes I often read DMs giving the advice to &quot;write specific PrCs into your campaign, don't just let the players read through the DMG and other books like a Sear's Catalog&quot;... or something to that effect anyways. If modules were the main source of Prestige Classes then this problem is cured, to a point. Now DMs will have logical reasons to use particular PrCs and actually have a way of introducing them meaningfully.Not to say that a Dungeon Master couldn't work PrCs into their campaign without the aid of modules. But it would be a great help for those who don't have time to read every Prestige Class ever written and try to work them into a campaign world.PS: And uh... what you said above me there. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Woas, post: 2647011, member: 16317"] I didn't really mean new game mechanics really when I wrote that. In my mind, I was thinking like [I]new rules[/i] for spells or feats... which really is just my terse way of saying "spell and feat discriptions, &c." It would be pretty crazy if a module had like, the Expanded Psionics Handbook or rules similar to Magic of Incarnum randomly in the back of it or something of the sort :) Exactly. Whenever I scan threads about Prestige Classes I often read DMs giving the advice to "write specific PrCs into your campaign, don't just let the players read through the DMG and other books like a Sear's Catalog"... or something to that effect anyways. If modules were the main source of Prestige Classes then this problem is cured, to a point. Now DMs will have logical reasons to use particular PrCs and actually have a way of introducing them meaningfully. Not to say that a Dungeon Master couldn't work PrCs into their campaign without the aid of modules. But it would be a great help for those who don't have time to read every Prestige Class ever written and try to work them into a campaign world. PS: And uh... what you said above me there. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification